If suit of Appellant is decreed, the claim being contingent, Appellant shall be entitled to claim from Successful Resolution Applicant
NCLAT held that time period of 7 days for removal of defects is directory and refiling after removal of defects not amounts to a fresh filing.
NCLAT held that Order passed by the Adjudicating Authority cannot be recalled on basis of overruling of the earlier Judgment. Otherwise, the litigation would never come to an end.
NCLAT held that Banker’s Certificate is not mandatorily required to trigger CIRP under Section 9 of IBC, 2016 (Code).
Excise and Taxation Department Vs Allied Strips Ltd. & Anr. (NCLAT) This case has been called out after a pass over but no one has put in appearance on behalf of the Appellant. It seems that the Appellant is not interested in pursuing this appeal though a claim has been set up of an amount […]
SC held that refiling of Application after curing defects in Application not amount to fresh filing of Application for counting limitation.
Held that the decision in regard to appointment of IRP as RP or replacement of IRP by another RP falling within the ambit of Section 22 of I&B Code, 2016 is a decision based on commercial wisdom of CoC. Thus, decision of the CoC, in accordance with law the same cannot be interfered with by the Tribunals
Held that the Corporate Debtor was permitted to use the trademark of KKR in relation to its licensed products, accordingly, there was temporary transfer/permission to use, constituting provision of service. Hence, due and payable arising out of such service is an operational debt
Held that only creditors who triggered the corporate insolvency resolution process can be impleaded as parties. An Appellant / Plaintiff in a given legal proceeding is the dominus litis.
Held that there was no dispute on the date of filing of the application u/s. 9 of the IBC nor at the stage of notice u/s. 8 of the IBC any dispute was raised. Thus, NCLT has committed error in outrightly rejecting the application under Section 9 of the IBC.
