Tvl. Alamelu Contracts Vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Madras High Court) The petitioner has challenged the impugned order, dated 16.07.2019, cancelling the Goods and Services Tax Registration. The impugned order preceded the show cause notice, dated 04.07.2019. It is the specific case of the petitioner that the petitioner was not having business and therefore, the […]
V. Vasanthakumar Vs Union of India (Madras High Court) Section 32(2)(a) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, postulates the qualifications for appointment of a Judicial Member and, as per the said provision, a Member of the Indian Legal Service who held the post of the Additional Secretary or equivalent post in that […]
Considering the fact that there is only a technical breach committed by the petitioner and there is no intention to evade tax, I am inclined to quash the impugned order and allow this writ petition by directing the respondent to release the vehicle and the consignment to the petitioner, if the same has not been released already.
Avatar Petro Chemicals Private Limited Vs Goods and Service Tax Council (Madras High Court) There is no provision under the provisions of the respective GST enactments for lapsing of the input tax credit and the credit availed on capital goods under the respective enactments. These credits are indefeasible. They were meant for being used for […]
CIT-LTU Vs Lakshmi General Finance Ltd (Merged with Sundaram Finance Limited) (Madras High Court) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee was entitled to claim depreciation on the windmills even though the wind mills had not generated any electricity during the […]
L. Ponnammal Vs Union of India (Madras High Court) By this writ petition a challenge is made to Sections 128 to 146 of the Finance Act, 2021 , with an alternative prayer to declare Section 5(9) of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 and Sections 128 to 130 and Sections 132 to 146 of the […]
Madras HC holds that recoveries under Section 79 of the CGST Act from the customers of the taxpayer, during the course of investigation is pre-mature. Calls such measure as ingenious way of creating liquidity crunch.
Thiru. Yasar Arabath, Vs Deputy Commissioner (State Taxes) (Madras High Court) In this case there is Sufficient materials available to show the petitioner without having inward supply of goods, have issued fake invoices without actual movement and supply of. He made total cash payment of Rs.7,30,324/- only as against the Rs.5,23,66,944/-. Hence, the offence committed […]
Taqa Neyveli Power Company Private Limited Vs Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Madras High Court) As has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner assessee that, once an appeal has been filed against the very revisional order under Section 263 of the Act, where date has been fixed for hearing, at least till […]
Pushpam Reality Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that these impugned assessments orders have been passed either without proper service of Show Cause Notices or without giving adequate opportunity to reply to the Show Cause Notices. It is therefore submitted that the impugned orders have been passed […]
