ITAT Visakhapatnam

Section 56(2)(vii)(b) Not Applicable if It Is Not Enacted as on Date of Agreement

ACIT Vs Sri Anala Anjibabu (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

The issue under consideration is whether provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) are applicable on difference between consideration paid for purchase of property and SRO value as on date of agreement?...

Read More

Income-Tax Payment made by Assessee is Application of Income & it is Eligible for Deduction u/s 11

DCIT (Exemptions) Vs Cargo Handling Pvt. Workers Pool Trust (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

The issue under consideration is whether the Income-tax payment made by assessee is an application of income and will be eligible for deduction u/s 11?...

Read More

Section 68 Addition not Justified for Unexplained Deposit in Bank Account

Dirisala Bala Murali Vs ITO ( ITAT Visakhapatnam)

The issue under consideration is whether the AO is justified in making addition u/s 68 towards alleged unexplained deposit in the bank account in as much as a bank account is not a book of account maintained by the appellant?...

Read More

No section 271E penalty if payments were genuine & duly accounted

Sudha Agro Oil & Chemical Industries Limited Vs Add. CIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Penalty under section 271E for violation of provision of section 269T could not be levied as assessee-company repaid loans advances otherwise than by crossed cheque, however, it substantiated with relevant documents that all the payments made by it were genuine and all the creditors accounted the loans as well as the repayments in their b...

Read More

Addition based on mere Whatsapp messages is not sustainable

ACIT Vs Shri Manchukonda Shyam (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Addition was made merely on the basis of whatsapp messages and the statement recorded from section 132(4) from Shri Lanka Anil Kumar which was subsequently retracted. Therefore we are of the view that the addition made by the AO is unsustainable....

Read More

No penalty on additional income admitted though there was no evidence

ACIT Vs Deccan Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

ACIT Vs Deccan Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam) We find from the orders of the lower authorities that the basis for additional income was only estimation but not supported by any evidence. Even the department failed to substantiate the industry average of purification loss with authenticated documentary evidences. The assessee sub...

Read More

Capital Gain payable on Transfer of Property to Builder through Sale Agreement alongwith POA

Shri. Tirumalasetti Srinivasa Rao Vs. DCIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Once the assessee had entered into agreement of sale coupled with power of attorney and handed over the possession of the property to the vendee, the transfer is complete as provided u/s 47 of the Act....

Read More

Deduction u/s 54F Allowed Even if Construction of New House Commenced Prior to Transfer of Asset

Natta Suryarao Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

The issue under consideration is whether the assessee would be entitled for deduction u/s 54F if construction of house is commenced prior to the transfer of the asset?...

Read More

Waiver of Working Capital Loan Taxable u/s 28(iv) and not u/s 41(1)

ITO Vs M/s Sri Vasavi Polymers P. Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

The issue under consideration is whether CIT(A) is correct in deleting the addition made by AO u/s 41(1) for waiver of working capital loan and charge it u/s 28 of the Act?...

Read More

No section 271C Penalty if TDS duly deducted & remitted at year end

ITO (TDS) Vs Om Sai Ram Enterprises Ravulapalem (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Where assessee duly deducted tax at source under section 194C at the end of the year and remitted the same to Government account, the penalty imposed under section 271C for assessee’s failure to deduct tax at source and remittance to Government account, would not be sustainable....

Read More

No addition for gifts if Assessee proves Identity, capacity & genuineness of donor

Dr. Vempala Bala Manohar Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Gifts are normally made by relatives out of natural love and affection and do not necessarily require any particular occasion. Assessee had discharged his burden by furnishing necessary details before AO. In the absence of anything to show that the transactions were by way of money laundering, ...

Read More

Mere Change of Opinion Cannot be Basis for Re-Opening of Assessment

DCIT Vs K.V. Mohana Rao and Co. Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

The issue under consideration is whether the re-opening of assessment u/s 147 is justified if the details on the basis of which case is re-opened was already available at the time of original assessment?...

Read More

Tax on Salary of non-resident for services rendered outside India

DCIT Vs Chukkapalli Mallikarjuna (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Section 5(2)(a) provides that only such income of non-resident would be subjected to tax in India that is either received or is deemed to be received in India, therefore, salary accrued to a non-resident seafarer for services rendered outside India on a foreign ship could not be included in total income merely because salary has been cred...

Read More

Section 271C applies to both failure to deduct and pay TDS

Eswar Exports Vs Add. CIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Since assessee had deducted the TDS, but not remitted to Government account and for that he had not given any satisfactory explanation either before AO or before CIT(A), therefore, penalty under section 271C was justified....

Read More

If assessee fails to establish genuineness of expenses than AO can compute income on estimate basis

ACIT Vs Raghavendra Constructions (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Many petty payments were made in cash and it was also not ascertainable whether payments attract disallowance under section 40A(3). Clearly, assessee could not establish genuineness of the expenses, therefore, AO was justified in computing income on estimate basis....

Read More

Disallowance u/s 14A cannot be made in absence of exempt income

DCIT  Vs Sarita Synthetics & Industries Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

No disallowance u/s 14A was called for in case of no exempt income earned by assessee in the relevant assessment years...

Read More

Addition justified for unexplained deposits in undeclared bank account

Smt. Dharipalli Rangamma Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Since the bank account in which assessee made huge cash deposits found during the course of search was not declared by assessee and assessee had not filed return for the year under consideration, therefore, the same constituted seized material so as to invoke section 153C in assessee’s case....

Read More

Addition u/s 68 was justified in respect of unexplained creditors shown as bogus

ITO Vs Sri Tadi Vasudeva Rao (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

AO was justified in making addition under section 68 of credit balance showing in assessees books of accounts against the Nil balance shown by the creditors in their books of accounts as on verification of the books of accounts of the creditor it was found that there was no balance outstanding against assessee and the same indicated that ...

Read More

Section 271FA penalty not leviable in absence of reportable transaction

M/s Guntur District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd. Vs Director of Income Tax (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Penalty under 271FA was unjustified as there was no requirement to file the AIR in absence of reportable transaction during the financial year and also, department did not make out a case that the assessee had the recorded re portable transactions in the relevant financial year....

Read More

No expenditure against exempt income to be disallowed in absence of exempt income

GVK Power & Infrastructure Ltd. Vs  ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Where there was no dividend income earned during the relevant assessment year, there was no case for disallowing the expenditure relatable to dividend income....

Read More

Notice u/s 148 to a dead person instead of legal heir was not valid

Sri Aemala Venkateswara Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

ssessment made by AO in the name of the legal heir without issuing notice u/ 148 was not valid as the notice under section 148 was required to be issued to a correct person and not to a dead person and the same was not a merely a procedural requirement but was a condition precedent to the impugned notice being valid in law....

Read More

Assessment u/s 153C on non-recording of reasons & unsigned order sheet invalid

Sri Sesha Sai Township P. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Where AO of searched person had not recorded the reasons and order sheet of  AO of assessee though reasons were typed but remained unsigned, notice issued u/s 153C and the assessment order passed by AO was not valid as AO did not comply with the statutory requirement for issue of notice u/s 153C....

Read More

Addition cannot be made for Share Capital as undisclosed Income merely on surmises

ACIT Vs Gowthami Chemicals & Pesticides (P) Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

ACIT Vs Gowthami Chemicals & Pesticides (P) Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam)  In this case, the assessee has furnished the confirmation letters explaining the identity of the shareholder, address and sources of income of the contributor to the share capital along with the evidence for land holdings and copies of IT returns in 4 cases before...

Read More

Unsigned reason cannot be treated as reasons recorded

Pinnamaraju Venkatapathi Raju Vs  JCIT (ITAT Vishakhapatnam)

Where AO typed the reasons but not signed the order sheet, there were no reasons recorded for re-opening assessment as required under section 148, therefore, notice issued under section 148 was bad in law, consequently reassessment order was to be annulled....

Read More

Court/Tribunal can dismiss appeal for non-prosecution

Satyanarayana & Ors. Vs CIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Where AO allowed interest on capital and remuneration paid to the partners from the estimated income on the basis of partnership deed, assessment made by AO on estimation of income could not be treated as erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of Revenue for invoking the jurisdiction under section 263....

Read More

Assessee in default if Not deducted TDS from payment made to non-residents on purchases of immovable property

Sri Teki Venkata Ramana Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Where assessee failed to deduct tax at source under section 195 from payment made to non-residents on purchases of immovable property from them and also assessee failed to obtain certificate for non-deduction of TDS, assessee was, therefore, rightly treated by AO as assessee-in-default under section 201(1)....

Read More

Sec 54 requires construction completion within 3 years irrespective of purchase date

Gandraju Prabhavathi Vs Pr. CIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Benefit u/s 54 can be availed even if plot was purchased prior to sale of property provided construction of the house property is completed within the time frame provided in Section 54. ...

Read More

Rice mill Lease rentals taxable as Income from other sources

Kanyaka Parameswari Rice Mill Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

In this case Since the rice mill owned by the assessee was let out to another rice mill and the rental income was received without carrying on any business activity or rendering any services incidental to carrying on the rice mill, therefore, the AO rightly assessed the income under the head ‘Income from other sources’....

Read More

Addition for Bogus share capital not sustainable without proving that shareholders did not have credit worthiness

ACIT Vs Gowthami Chemicals & Pesticides (P) Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

ACIT Vs Gowthami Chemicals & Pesticides (P) Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam) In this case, the assessee has furnished the confirmation letters explaining the identity of the shareholder, address and sources of income of the contributor to the share capital along with the evidence for land holdings and copies of IT returns in 4 cases before t...

Read More

Section 263 Inadequate inquiry by AO, cannot be considered as lack of inquiry

Fusion Voice Solutions India (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Inadequate inquiry by AO with respect to compliance of TDS under section 194H could not be equated with lack of inquiry, so as take the case for revision under section 263....

Read More

Provisions on Notional basis & not accrued liability not eligible for deduction

Kanaka Mahalakshmi Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Recently, in the Kanaka Mahalakshmi Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs. ACIT & vice-versa [ITA Nos. 299 & 300/VIZ/2017 and ITA Nos. 326 & 327/VIZ/2017, (A.Y.: 2012-13 & 2013-14), decided on 5.9.2018], there were cross appeals by the assessee and the Revenue for the AYs 2012-13 & 2013 & 14. In ITA No. 299/VIZ/2007, one of the ground related to the a...

Read More

Set-off of unabsorbed depreciation allowable against Addition U/s. 68

Asst. Vs Sai Bhaskar Irons Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Asst. Vs Sai Bhaskar Irons Ltd. Once addition under section 68 was included in gross total income, AO had to allow set off of unabsorbed depreciation loss as provided under section 71 dealing with the set off of loss from one head against income from another head. FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT This appeal […]...

Read More

Assessment U/s. 153C not valid in Absence of incriminating material

Shri Balaji Builders Kakinada Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Shri Balaji Builders Kakinada Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam) Merely because books of account could not be traced at the time of survey/search, it could not be presumed that the books of account were not maintained unless all the efforts were made by AO. Further As per the provisions of section 153C of the Act, it […]...

Read More

Addition U/s. 68 for Alleged unaccounted stock merely based on value of closing stock declared to banks is not sustainable

ACIT Vs Thatavarthi Ramesh Babu Kanuru (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

ACIT Vs Thatavarthi Ramesh Babu Kanuru (ITAT Visakhapatnam) It is no doubt true that the initial burden is upon the assessee to prove the correct value of the stock held by the assessee and he has to prove that the value reflected in the books of accounts is correct but the fact remains that the […]...

Read More

TDS not deductible on Reimbursement of conversion expenses without profit element

ACIT Vs Veera Associates (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Assessee filed return of income declaring total income of 3,90,370/- on 3.10.2007. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as the Act) on 31.12.2009 determining the total income at 6,90,370/-. Subsequently, the case was reopened u/s 147 of the Act by issue of notice u/s 148 of the Act for n...

Read More

Deduction U/s. 54F for Property purchased in name of individual co-parcener by HUF

Grandhi Nageswara Rao (HUF) Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

In this case, the assessee filed the return of income admitting total income of 98,820/-. A search u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as the Act) was carried out in the case of M/s. A.S. Steel Traders on 11.10.2012 and in the course of search, the document No.5019 of 2011 of SRO...

Read More

Re-Assessment Invalid if order sheet recording reason for reopening is unsigned

Sri Pinnamaraju Venkatapathi Raju Visakhapatnam Vs JCIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Sri Pinnamaraju Venkatapathi Raju Visakhapatnam Vs JCIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam) In the instant case, on verification of the assessment record, it is noticed that the A.O. typed the reasons but not signed the order sheet, thus there are no reasons recorded for reopening of assessment as required u/s 148 of the Act. The A.O. neither complied [...

Read More

Subscription to chit funds cannot be regarded as investment U/s. 13(1)(d) RW 11(5)

Sri Sivani Educational Society Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Sri Sivani Educational Society Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam) Chit fund business is governed by the principles of mutuality and contribution to a chit fund is contribution to oneself on the principle of mutuality and hence, it is not an investment as contemplated by section 13(1)(d) read with section 11(5) of Income Tax Act, 1961. As [&hell...

Read More

Reopening of assessment cannot be permitted merely on the ground of Survey

Dy. CIT Vs. Dr. M.J. Naidu (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Where AO reopened the assessment, based on statements recorded and material impounded during survey, however, without establishing any whisper from the reasons recorded regarding the escapement of any income, such reassessment based on suspicion and surmises was set aside....

Read More

Addition U/s. 69 justified if assessee cannot furnish any explanation regarding source of receipt of money

K.L. Prasada Rao Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Where assessee could not furnish any explanation regarding source of receipt of money, except saying that it was loan borrowed from parties, the addition made by the AO under section 69 was justified....

Read More

Assessee is entitled to deduction for payment of gratuity to LIC

The District Co-operative Central Bank Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

In the instant case the assessee has made the payments to the LIC towards group gratuity scheme directly in approved schemes. The assessee has also obtained the policy in favor of the bank. The assessee has no control over the funds contributed to LIC towards the gratuity. ...

Read More

Wealth Tax: Non striking irrelevant column in notice issued u/s 18(1)(c) renders notice invalid

T.S.Kalyana Chakravarthy Vs Dy.Director of Wealth Tax (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

The Ld.CWT(A) should have struck off the irrelevant column and made known the assessee by mentioning for which reason the penalty was initiated. Penalty u/s 18(1)(c) of WT Act are parimateria to Income Tax Act 271(1)(c). As per settled case laws non striking the irrelevant column in the notice issued u/s 18(1)(c) renders the notice invali...

Read More

Mere Material found during survey not gives any authorization to AO to make assessment U/s. 153C & 153A unless the same evidences Income understatement

Supraja’s Sandy Lane Bar & Restaurant Vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Supraja’s Sandy Lane Bar & Restaurant Vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam) As per 153C of Income Tax Act for invoking jurisdiction, there must be incriminating material found and seized during the course of search in form of money, bullion, jewellery or the evidences indicating the inflation of e expenditure or undisclosed investments or s...

Read More

Remuneration mutually agreed between partners is allowable if partnership deed permits the same subject to limit u/s 40(b)

The ACIT Vs. M/s Sri Navodaya Granite Industries (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Visakhapatnam bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently held that remuneration paid to partner cannot be disallowed since there is a clause existing in the partnership deed which specified the exceeding limit. ...

Read More

Interest on fund temporarily parked in short term deposits is taxable as business income

ACIT Vs M/s. Agri Gold (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

ACIT Vs M/s. Agri Gold (ITAT Visakhapatnam) During the assessment year, the assessee has received the interest of Rs.  7,43,76,762/- and offered it under the business income. The said practice of offering the interest income under the head business income was followed by the assessee for the last so many years, which was accepted by [&he...

Read More

Payment made towards purchase of flat cannot be treated as deemed dividend

DCIT Vs Smt. Sriram Satyavathi (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

DCIT Vs Smt. Sriram Satyavathi (ITAT Visakhapatnam) The fact that the company M/s. Vijetha Constructions has taken the advances for sale of flats was substantiated by the registered sale agreements. The same cheque No. and the dates were mentioned in the promissory note and the sale deeds which fortifies the assessee’s contention that t...

Read More

No penalty for Failure to deduct TDS due to Wrong Classification of Payments

M/s P.S.R. Associates Vs. JCIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

In the instant case, the tax has not deducted the TDS due to wrong classification of the payments made which was included under the heading ‘purchases’ and the purchases do not attract the TDS, whereas the sub contract payments attract TDS....

Read More

Approval u/s 80G(5) cannot be denied at initial stages for not undertaking any activity or Substantial Activity

Mattapalli Chalamayya Charitable Trust Visakhapatnam Vs CIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Mattapalli Chalamayya Charitable Trust Visakhapatnam Vs CIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam) If the activities of the trust are genuine, at the stage of commencement of institution, registration has to be granted automatically and claim u/s 80G of the Act can be followed with grant of registration. Ld. Commissioner (Exemptions) did not reject the req...

Read More

Addition for non TDS deduction not justified if form 15G been obtained

Sri Nidamanuri Nageswara Rao Korukonda Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Though the amount was credited to her account in the books of accounts of the assessee, the payment was not made to her and before making the payment and filing the return of income, the assessee had obtained the form 15G and forwarded to the Ld. CIT. Since the recipient was not having taxable income, obtaining form 15G before making the ...

Read More

Notice U/s. 148 Issued during pendency of assessment proceedings is invalid

Medapati Venkayamma Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

The assessing officer issued notice under section 148 for reassessment, during the pendency of assessment proceedings by issue of notice under section 148 which is bad in law and cannot be sustained ...

Read More

Donation received for specific purpose cannot be regarded as income u/s 2(24)(iia)

Touching Heart Ministries Vs. Income Tax Officer (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Touching Heart Ministries Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam) In the instant case, the donations were received for specific purpose for acquiring the fixed assets. This is evidenced by the letters placed before us from the donors. The funds are not freely available to the assessee society, for utilizing its objectives other than acquiring specif...

Read More

S.43B(f): provision for future leave encashment allowable in year of payment

M/s. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. Vs. JCIT (OSD) (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

M/s. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. Vs. JCIT (OSD) (ITAT Visakhapatnam) The assessee company has created a provision under the head ’Future Leave Encashment’. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee company was asked to explain how the amount debited towards the provision for future leave encashment can be allowed as ded...

Read More

AO cannot treat activities of Trust as business without examining the same

ACIT (Exemptions) Vs. The Andhra Cricket Association (ITAT Vishakhapatnam)

ACIT (Exemptions) Vs. Andhra Cricket Association (ITAT Vishakhapatnam) The assessee is receiving grants from BCCI partly as reimbursements for various tournaments conducted by the assessee. The assessee has already constructed a stadium at Visakhapatnam suitable for conducting ‘test matches‘. During the year under consideratio...

Read More

Assessment U/s. 153A- In absence of Incriminating material no addition can be made in respect of concluded assessments

Y.V. Anjaneyulu Vs. Dy. CIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Books of account and financials being already part of regular return filed by assessee, same could not be considered as incriminating material found during search and, therefore, AO could not make addition on the basis thereof in respect of already concluded assessments....

Read More

Goodwill is an asset eligible for depreciation U/s. 32 of I.T. Act, 1961

The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1(1) Vs. M/s Cresa Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Cresa Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam) 1. This appeal is filed by the revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Rajahmundry vide ITA No. 0239/13-14/ACIT/C-1/RJY/2014-15 dated 30.03.2015 for the assessment year 2010-11. 2. All the grounds of appeal are r...

Read More

Advance to Directors for Land Purchase cannot be treated as Deemed Dividend

D.L.V. Sridhar Vs. DCIT, Circle-2(1) (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, recently ruled that advances given to the directors of a Company for purchase of land cannot be treated as deemed dividend Under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 since the land is transferred to the company within time....

Read More

Giving awards, felicitating eminent people and organizing public debates is not charitable activity

Sri Chukkapalli Pitchaiah Foundation Vs. CIT(Exemptions) (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Denying 12AA registration to a Trust, ITAT held that activity of organizing meetings and giving awards to eminent people do not fit into the definition of charitable purpose under Income Tax Act, 1961....

Read More

Deal cancellation compensation expense cannot be claimed from Capital Gain

Kodanda Ramaiah Varadhi Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Under the head Capital gains only direct expenses relatable to transfer of property are allowed as deduction. Therefore, the cancellation expenses should not be held to be incurred either for acquiring the property or for transfer of property...

Read More

Mere share transfer agreement does not cause effective share transfer unless accompanied with Transfer form & Share Certificates

Y.V. Ramana Vs CIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

In the case of shares of unlisted companies, transfer would take place, only when valid share transfer form in form no. 7B is delivered to the company and endorsed by the Company. Therefore, for effective transfer of shares a mere agreement for transfer of shares is not sufficient, unless it is physically transfer shares by delivery of sh...

Read More

S. 35(2AB): AO bound to grant deduction if R&D facility is approved by competent authority

Efftronics Systems Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Provisions of section 35(2AB) of the Act, with relevant rules makes it mandatory for the assessee company to file its application for approval of its in house R&D before the Secretary, DSIR, Government of India....

Read More

Land cannot be classified as non-agricultural for mere agricultural activity absence

Smt. Chalasani Naga Ratna Kumari Vs ITO, (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Whether an agricultural land held by assessee, which is suitable for agricultural operation, loses the characteristics of agricultural land merely because no agricultural operation was carried by assessee on such land?...

Read More

Section 50C Market Value on sale deed date or stamp duty value on sale agreement date

Chalasani Naga Ratna Kumari, Visakhapatnam Vs ITO, Ward-3(2) (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

For determination of capital gains according to section 50C market value of property as on date of sale deed or stamp duty value as on date of agreement to sale: which has to be taken?...

Read More

Retrospective amendment in expl. 5A to Sec 271(1)(c) not applicable if original return filed before Finance Act comes into force

Nukala Ramakrishna, Eluru Vs DCIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Amendment in Explanation 5A to Sec 271(1)(c) even when made effective by Finance Act ,2009 with retrospective effect from 01.06.2007 cannot be made applicable to assessee’s case because both original return and the revised return u/s 153A of the Act have been filed before the amended provisions were brought into the statute (which rece...

Read More

Clash of titans, sec 192 Vs sec 206AA

Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. Vs Addl CIT (TDS), (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v. Addl CIT (TDS), ITAT Visakhapatnam) Even if there is no PAN, if the deductor has deducted TDS as per provisions of sec 192, Section 206AA does not over-ride section 192 in terms of the requirement of “at the rates specified in the relevant provisions of the Act....

Read More

For Deemed Dividend, accumulated profits do not include current year’s business profit, since it accrues only at end of year

P. Satya Prasad Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Thus, it has been held that the accumulated profits do not include current year's business profit, since it accrues only at the end of the year. Further the loan or advance treated as deemed income up to the date of fresh loan is to be reduced from the accumulated profits. Consistent with the view taken by the Ahmedabad bench in the above...

Read More

s.40(a)(ia) apply only to expenditure remaining payable

Rajamahendri Shipping & Oil Field Services Ltd., Vs. Addl. CIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Provisions of sec.40(a)(ia) would apply only to the expenditure which remain payable as at the end of the relevant financial year. Assessee entitled to claim deduction of expenses if the TDS deducted there on is remitted before the due date for filing the return of income. ...

Read More

S.40(a)(ia) not applicable to amounts paid by 31st March

Merilyn Shipping & Transports Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (ITAT Vishakha Patanam)

Merilyn Shipping & Transports v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM (SPECIAL BENCH) Whether Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act can be invoked only to disallow expenditure of the nature referred to therein which is shown as payable as on the date of the balance sheet or it can be invoked also to disallow such e...

Read More

Reassessment after completion of assessment u/s 143(3) cannot be termed as regular assessment and interest u/s 234D not chargeable

Dredging Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

The assessee was given refund while processing the return u/s. 143(1) and further refund was given after assessment u/s. 143(3). In reassessment proceedings u/s. 147, the refund given earlier became collectible from the assessee. The Assessing officer levied interest u/s. 234D on such excess refund amount. The learned CIT(A) held that the...

Read More

Payments for supply of technical documents taxable as fees for technical services

Hindustan Shipyard Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

ITAT held that the payment received for supplying the ‘Repair Technical Documents’ are treated as ‘Fees for Technical Services’ (FTS) under the Income-tax Act,1961 (the Act). The Tribunal further observed that the technical materials supplied by the taxpayer would not lose the characteristics of ‘Service’, simply because they ...

Read More

CIT (A) Guilty of ‘Contempt’ For Not Following ITAT Verdict

M/s. Cargo Handling Private Workers Pool Vs. DCIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Cargo Handling Private Workers Pool Vs. DCIT (ITAT Vizag)- Since the Income tax Appellate Tribunal is exercising judicial functions, it is now settled that it has all powers of Court, i.e. it can issue summons and exercise all the powers vested in the Income tax authorities under section 131 of the Income tax Act. Hence any proceeding bef...

Read More

Eligibility for exemption under section 54B in respect of amount invested in agricultural land against gain from sale of agricultural land

Krishna Murthy Vallu Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Krishna Murthy Vallu Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)- If land which is sold is situated in an area which is comprised within the jurisdiction of a municipality, etc, then the said land is squarely covered by clause (a) of section 2(14)(iii) and would fall in the category of 'Capital assets' even if it is held to be agricultural land. However...

Read More

Receipts from activities not having direct nexus with shipping/dredging activities not exempt under tonnage tax scheme

Dredging Corporation Of India Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Dredging Corporation Of India Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)- Tonnage income from the business of operating qualifying ships — Receipts emanating from the activities, which do not have a direct and necessary nexus with the shipping/ dredging activities of the assessee-company, cannot be exempted under the tonnage tax scheme. ...

Read More

No Transfer pricing adjustment is necessary when period and basis of computation of royalty is different from comparable transactions

M/s. Transstory (India) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Transstory (India) Ltd. Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)- The taxpayer was to pay royalty for only seven years and in respect of certain specified product, the royalty payable by the two group companies in China was for 20 years and it was based on sales of all the products. The only basis of adjustment made by the TPO is variation in rates o...

Read More

Business losses carried forward beyond a period of eight years could be deducted in computing the book profit

Susi Sea Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Susi Sea Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT - Business losses carried forward beyond a period of eight years could be deducted in computing the book profit and hence the limitation of eight years for carry forward and set off of business losses under the normal tax provisions is not applicable while computing book profit under section 115JA of the I...

Read More

Section 50C should be applied only on the date of sale agreement and not on the date of actual registration of conveyance deed

Koduru Satya Srinivas & Anr. Vs ACIT (ITAT Vishakapatnam)

The solitary issue urged in these two appeals is that Whether the Learned CIT(A) is right in law in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in invoking the provisions of section 50C in the case of both the assessees....

Read More

S. 50C Relevant Date for Determination of Stamp Duty Value

M/s. Lahiri Promoters Vs. ACIT (ITAT Vishakapatnam)

The assessee, a partnership firm, filed its return of income for asst. year 2006- 07 declaring the income under the head Capital Gains at Rs. 28,767,565/-, which are related to the gains obtained on sale of three immovable properties....

Read More

Income from even an isolated transaction of sale of land can be considered as business income of an assessee though not carrying on real estate business

Cherukuri Ramesh Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

The process of purchase of land, conversion thereof and sale, compel us to come to the conclusion that the * purchase of land, in itself, was with an intention to sell at a profit in the form of an 'adventure in the nature of trade' and hence though it is an isolated' transaction the income thereon can still be considered as business inco...

Read More

Mythri Transport Vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

M/s. Mythri Transport Vs A.C.I.T. (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

Whether the vehicles hired by the assessee in execution of the transport contract can be termed as a Sub-contract and consequently the assessee is liable to deduct tax from the payment made for such vehicles u/s 194C (2) of the Act the assessee is not liable to deduct tax at source, as per the provisions of section 194C(2), on the payment...

Read More

S. 220(2) Interest chargeable with reference to due date reckoned from original notice of demand

DCIT Vs. AS Krishna & Co. (P.) Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

It is thus clear that the entire assessment order was not set aside to enable the Assessing Officer to reframe the assessment; the order passed by the first appellate authority was only to enable to the Assessing Officer to vary the assessment originally made and not to take a reiook at all the issues which were considered in the original...

Read More

Finance companies too governed by provisions of section 269SS and 269T of the Income Tax Act, 1961

DCIT Vs. Erneskay Financial Services Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam)

For a finance company, money is the product with which it carries on the business. Since the directors have made maiden venture. The necessity of establishing good will and reputation, that too in a finance company, is of utmost necessity. At the same time, it cannot give a permanent license to the company to continue to violate the provi...

Read More

The depreciation cannot be taken as ‘notionally allowed’, but only as ‘actually allowed’

Padmavathi Srinivasa Cotton Ginning & Pressing Factory Vs DCIT (ITAT Vishakhapatnam)

The effect of omission of section 34 and Rule 5AA and consequential amendment in section 32 by omitting reference to section 34 makes it clear that one cannot taken support from the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Mahendra Mills, supra, after the amendment. Section 43(6) of the Act which defines the term "Written Down Va...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (5,040)
Company Law (6,697)
Custom Duty (8,071)
DGFT (4,384)
Excise Duty (4,406)
Fema / RBI (4,431)
Finance (4,692)
Income Tax (35,022)
SEBI (3,751)
Service Tax (3,626)

Search Posts by Date

November 2020
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30