Penalty under section 270 A was not leviable as the nature of addition/disallowance were not in the nature of misreporting or misreporting income of assessee and assessee had paid the demand within 30 days and filed the required form no. 68 and that form was procedural in nature.
Naveen Bolia Vs ITO (ITAT Jodhpur) The case of Naveen Bolia Vs ITO, adjudicated by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Jodhpur, revolves around the legality of assessment and the merits of certain additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO). The appellant, Naveen Bolia, challenged the assessment order on two primary grounds: the legality of […]
In the case of Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Jodhpur), Bench ruled no addition for explained demonetization currency deposited in bank, validating proper accounting practices.
Dhanpat Raj Khatri Vs ITO (ITAT Jodhpur) If the explanation based on accounts supported by affidavit is not controverted, no addition should be made.
Detailed analysis of the ITAT Jodhpur decision in Gaurav Purohit vs PCIT, covering the grounds of appeal, legal arguments, and implications for future cases.
Discover why ITAT Jodhpur ruled that cash deposits made by a 77-year-old assesse during demonetization couldn’t be added under section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
Read the detailed analysis of Birla Cement Works STFF Provident Fund’s appeal against the late fee imposed under section 234E of the Income Tax Act. ITAT Jodhpur’s order considered technical errors and the impact of COVID-19.
ITAT Jodhpur rules that possession of transport vehicles is sufficient for Section 194C TDS exception, emphasizing the significance of beneficial ownership.
In the case of Rohit Yadav Vs ACIT, ITAT directs denovo-adjudication as CIT(A)[NFAC] fails to discuss additional evidence. Read the full analysis and conclusion.
Bhamashah Sundarlal Daga Charitable Trust wins ITAT Jodhpur appeal against CIT’s rejection of 80G registration. Detailed analysis on amendments and absurdity in literal interpretation.
