Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Punam Kanwar Bhati Vs ITO (ITAT Jodhpur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Punam Kanwar Bhati Vs ITO (ITAT Jodhpur)

Conclusion: Penalty under section 270 A was not leviable as the nature of addition/disallowance were not in the nature of misreporting or misreporting income of assessee and assessee had paid the demand within 30 days and filed the required form no. 68 and that form was procedural in nature.

Held: During the year under consideration, AO had added Rs.28,388/- on account of violation of section 40A(3), Rs. 26,811/- on account of Interest income  and disallowed excess depreciation claimed amounting to R

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31