ITAT Jaipur held that addition towards undisclosed income rightly sustained since assessee failed to explain the incriminating material found during the course of search. Penalty under section 271AAB too sustained.
ITAT Jaipur held that reasons recorded for selecting case for scrutiny never mentioned that case was selected for limited scrutiny hence approval for conversion not required. Matter remanded to CIT(A) to decide case based on merits.
ITAT Jaipur quashes tax addition and penalty against 82-year-old senior citizen, finding no fault in her investment claims and supporting her submitted evidence.
ITAT Jaipur applies Section 44AD, taxing retail business gross deposits at 8%. Addition of Rs. 25.56 lakh reduced; appeal partly allowed.
ITAT Jaipur directs CIT(E) to review OP Dargar Foundation’s rejected 12AB registration, citing curable defects & natural justice. Delay condoned based on Katiji Judgment.
Jaipur ITAT sets aside PCIT order under Section 263 in Smt. Lata Phulwani case, citing AO’s due inquiry and permissible view on Sec 54F deduction.
ITAT Jaipur quashes addition of suppressed school fees for Pushpa Vidya Niketan, stating survey statements lack evidentiary value without corroboration.
ITAT Jaipur’s ruling on Kailash Chand vs ITO case, analyzing tax assessment, additions, and legal compliance under Section 144 & 147 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Jaipur sends Puneet Singhvi’s capital gains case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh review after the assessee failed to appear in earlier proceedings.
While a best judgment assessment can involve some arbitrariness, it must be an honest and fair estimate based on available material and circumstances, not capricious.
