ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition on grounds other than grounds forming part of reasons recorded for reopening of assessment not justified. Accordingly, addition towards unexplained investment which didn’t form part of reasons liable to be deleted.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act not justified since loan transactions were done through banking channels and loans were repaid in short period. Accordingly, addition deleted.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that invocation of Revision proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act after approval of the Resolution Plan by NCLT is against the Provisions of Law. Accordingly, revisionary proceedings quashed.
TAT considered detailed submissions, including third-party confirmations and supporting documents such as income tax returns of lenders and certificates of interest. It concluded that the nexus between the income and expenses was well established, making the disallowance unsustainable.
ITAT Ahmedabad allows Pankajkumar Patel’s appeal for statistical purposes, remanding unexplained investment case to AO for reconsideration under Section 69A.
Summary of appeal challenging CIT(A) order on income tax assessment for AY 2013-14. Key issues include Section 147 validity and profit estimation.
ITAT Ahmedabad narrows PCIT’s directions under Section 263 in Vimal Agarwal’s tax case for AY 2014-15, limiting inquiry to commission on ₹92 lakh entry.
Summary of an appeal against a CIT(A) order confirming additions under Section 69A for AY 2017-18. Directions issued for de-novo proceedings.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands Bholaram Education Society’s tax appeal for fresh hearing after procedural lapses in notices and portal access issues.
ITAT remands the matter of unsecured loan addition to CIT(A) for fresh consideration after non-admittance of evidence in the case of Amitkumar Patel.
