ITAT Ahmedabad held that payment of cash towards purchase of land exceeding the prescribed limit is duly disallowed under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that tax deduction at source doesn’t apply to service which are neither availed nor rendered and not even utilized in India. Accordingly, disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) unjustified.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that on execution of agreement when the possession was also handed over, the transfer within the meaning of section 2(47)(v) and (vi) was complete and accordingly capital gain provisions gets applicable.
ITAT Ahmedabad condones Saraswati Trust’s late appeal due to consultant error, remands case for fresh consideration under Section 12A.
Read how ITAT Ahmedabad orders fresh adjudication due to non-cooperation of tax consultant in furnishing property investment details in Pravinchandra Naranbhai Patel case.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that denial of exemption u/s. 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act justified as assessee trust having multiple objects doesn’t satisfy the condition of ‘solely for educational purposes’.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that where no exempt income is earned by the assessee there is no case for making any disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.
Analysis of the ITAT Ahmedabad’s ruling on Bharatbhai Makwana Vs PCIT. Delving into the implications of incorrect terminologies in tax audit reports relating to granule purchases.
Analysis of Shiva Pharmachem Ltd vs. DCIT case where ITAT Ahmedabad rules no disallowance under section 14A of Income Tax Act without any exempt income. Full text of ITAT order included.
Explore the key details and implications of ITAT Ahmedabad’s ruling on the Shanti Multilink Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT case concerning the validity of an assessment order under section 263.
