ITAT Ahmedabad allows appeal by Digamber Jain Trust, questioning rectification order on unexplained cash deposits for AY 2016-17, due to pending original assessment.
No requirement to prove the irrecoverability of a debt; it suffices if the debt is written off in the books of accounts: ITAT Ahmedabad in Ishan Equipments Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT
ITAT Ahmedabad excused non-compliance due to CA’s failure, remanding the case for verification of additional evidence related to cash deposits and investments.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that disallowance of interest expense by treating the same as unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Income Tax Act needs re-verification. Accordingly, matter send back to the file of jurisdictional AO.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the TP assessment carried out by the TPO proceeded on the basis of incorrect appreciation of nature of services availed by the assessee from its AE. Thus, issue of determination of ALP of transactions with AE restored back to TPO.
ITAT Ahmedabad directs AO to reassess Vallabh Pesticides’ loan and credit entries, emphasizing a fresh review of evidence and loan credibility under Section 68.
ITAT Ahmedabad upholds CIT(A)’s ruling dismissing Revenue’s appeal on unexplained cash credits. Genuineness confirmed in remand report for A.Y. 2016-17.
ITAT Ahmedabad allows registration under section 12AB, clarifying that section 13(1)(b) applies only at the assessment stage.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that AO and CIT(A) confirmed the addition since there was non-compliance on the part of the assessee. Thus, one more opportunity granted to the assessee to present its case however with a direction to deposit INR 2000 to the Prime Minister’s Relief Fund.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that AO allowed the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(v) of the Income Tax Act without adequate inquire. Accordingly, revisionary jurisdiction u/s. 263 rightly invoked as order passed by AO was erroneous and prejudicial to interest of revenue.