ITAT Ahmedabad ruled that Section 68 doesn’t apply to a partnership firm for capital introduced by partners, upholding a CIT(A) decision. Appeal dismissed.
ITAT sets aside CIT(A) dismissal of Luv Procon’s appeal due to email notices despite a request for physical communication. Delay condoned; fresh hearing ordered.
ITAT Ahmedabad directs a fresh assessment after AO ignored filed ITR in Govindbhai Hirabhai Bharvad case, due to ex-parte assessment and delay issues.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands CIT(E) order rejecting Manav Seva Mandir’s 80G(5) registration, citing lack of communication and technical issues in notice delivery.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses Revenue’s appeal, validates the sale price of unquoted shares in Bipin Babubhai Panchal’s LTCG case, rejecting fabrication claims.
ITAT Ahmedabad directs CIT (E) to process trust’s fresh Form 10AB application under Section 80G(5) despite a 331-day delay in filing the appeal.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses Navgujarat Foundation’s appeal but directs CIT (E) to process the fresh Form 10AB application under Section 80G(5).
AO, however, did not accept the explanation of the assessee and the accumulation of income of Rs.5,92,352/-in A.Y. 2008-09, which was held as not applied within the stipulated period of 5 years, was treated as income of the current year.
ITAT Ahmedabad quashed the reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act as intraday profit is less than limitation of Rs. 1,00,000/- for reopening of assessment u/s. 147 of the Act.
After taking cognisance of the reply of the assessee, PCIT held that AO has not applied his mind in respect of the amended provisions of Section 14A and, therefore, the Assessment Order is prejudicial to the interest of Revenue and is erroneous.
