Special Court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 held that both the accused i.e. Sanjay Raut and Pravin Raut has been arrested illegally as both the accused have satisfied twin conditions under section 45(1)(i)(ii) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
District Court New Delhi held that the prosecution u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot be dismissed or stalled for non-compliance of Section 269 SS of the Income Tax Act. Such violation may give rise to an independent criminal offence, but, the prosecution of the accused for the alleged dishonour of cheque u/s 138 NI Act does not become bad in law.
CGST Vs. Mohd. Sabahuddin (Patiala House Court) Considering that accused has admittedly not joined investigation pursuant to summons dated 19.04.2022 and 29.04.2022 and admittedly did not drop the Google pin location, therefore, has violated condition No.1 and 2 of bail order dated 17.02.2022 of Ld. Predecessor of this Court. Furthermore, since proper reasoning has been […]
Smt. Rakhi Singh Vs State of U.P (District Court of Varanasi) In Gyanvapi case court rejected the Muslim side’s petition and said the suit is maintainable. The next hearing of the case is on Sep 22. Court held that suit of the plaintiffs is not barred by the Uttar Pradesh Sri Kashi Vishwanath Temple Act, 1983, […]
In the present complaint, Opposite Parties have tampered with original MRP Price of oil sachet and charged extra amount more than MRP.
Held that there is no infringement of copyright as some contents are bound to be similar as teaching given in the Holy Books Quran and Hadees and other religious text related to Islam religion are bound to be same in all books which are about teaching on Islam.
It is not the matter of mere initiation of refund under the CGST Act only, rather now it appears to have become an offence punishable under Sections 420/467/468/471 of IPC wherein the maximum punishment prescribed is imprisonment for life.
The ICAI under Chairmanship of G. Soma Shekher sent representative to ascertain the facts from India TV News Channel and upon finding material of paper leak, lodged the present FIR. Investigation was carried out and considering the gravity of the same, investigation was taken up by the Crime Branch department.
It is also alleged that the accused persons failed to cooperate and provide any assistance even to the statutory and forensic auditors of the Corporate Debtor during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
Hetram Vs DGGI (Gurugram Court) This is the application for hail filed by applicant-accused Hetram in criminal complaint under section 132(1)(h) & (c) of GST Act, 2017 (hereinafter called the Act). 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant that the applicant is Director of M/s Rajnandini Metal Ltd. thereinafter referred as M/s Rajnandini) […]
