Case Law Details
CGST Vs. Mohd. Sabahuddin (Patiala House Court)
Considering that accused has admittedly not joined investigation pursuant to summons dated 19.04.2022 and 29.04.2022 and admittedly did not drop the Google pin location, therefore, has violated condition No.1 and 2 of bail order dated 17.02.2022 of Ld. Predecessor of this Court. Furthermore, since proper reasoning has been given by the department as to why question pertaining to M/s Zam Zam Exim Pvt. Ltd. has been put to the accused and that accused cannot avoid investigation or ignore summons issued by the department for joining investigation by raising grounds now regarding jurisdiction etc. when present application for cancellation of bail has been filed and accused has a right to silence but cannot ignore the summons issued by the department to join investigation especially when accused did not move for quashing of notice/summons himself, therefore, present application is allowed and bail granted to accused vide order dated 17.02.2022 is cancelled.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF DISTRICT COURT
Reply, rejoinder, counter reply and counter rejoinder have already been filed and supplied to the parties.
Arguments on behalf of Department as well as accused already heard.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
