Jindal Steel & Power Limited Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Delhi) Facts in brief are that the assessing officer has, in the assessment order, while holding the impugned subsidy as revenue receipt, simultaneously reduced the same from cost of fixed assets, while applying provisions of Explanation 10 to section 43(1) of the Act resulting in double […]
Grant Thornton Advisory (P.) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: No TDS was to be deducted under section 195 on payment made by assessee to GTIL, UK towards membership and subscription fee as the relationship between GTIL, UK and its members would be governed by the principle of mutuality, hence, would not be taxable. Held: […]
KRBL Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) During the course of assessment proceedings, the appellant submitted that the cash purchases were made by it from Mandi Samitis located across UP from farmers and hence did not fall under the ambit of the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act, as the same were covered by Rule […]
DCIT Vs IFCI (ITAT Delhi) Issue- On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred in deleting the disallowance made on depreciation of finance leased assets amounting to Rs. 1,31,63,444/- holding that it is one of the business of assessee. Held- Depreciation of finance least assets is related to the […]
Keshav Saran Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) In the present case, the assessee has actually filed the return of income and the Assessing Officer in the satisfaction note noted that the assessee has not filed return of income. Thus, we safely presume that the Assessing Officer has initiated reassessment proceedings by mentioning wrong and incorrect facts […]
Pranav Saran Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) There are divergent views on this taxability of interest on the enhanced compensation awarded u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act wherein the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court has consistently taking a view that it is an income to be treated under the head ‘income from other sources’. […]
Esteem Finventures Limited (Now Kapedome Enterprises Limited) Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT is of considered opinion that the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition by stretching too far the rules of prudence. The Ld. AO himself observed in the order that the services engaged were from top most legal professionals. If that was the view […]
TPO/AO cannot apply wrong method in the absence of material ie: audited financials of AE. More so, TPO/AO cannot even give the benefit as well to assessee for non cooperation for providing the audited financials of AE.
Advances rent during the course of opening of showroom were given in the course of business by assessee and for the purpose of commercial expediency. Therefore, forfeiture of the same by the concerned party had rightly claimed by assesseee as business loss.
Allied Agencies Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of TS Balaram Vs. Volkart Brothers 82 ITR 50 (SC) clearly held that a mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which has to be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points […]
