This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 40A(3) not applies on cash purchases made from Mandi Samiti
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- KRBL Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
KRBL Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
During the course of assessment proceedings, the appellant submitted that the cash purchases were made by it from Mandi Samitis located across UP from farmers and hence did not fall under the ambit of the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act, as the same were covered by Rule 6DD of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. As per the AO, in order to claim benefit of Rule 6DD, it is the primary onus of the appellant to prove that cash purchases were made from bonafide agriculturists/cultivators, however, the appellant only relied upon the submission that pur...






