Courts: CESTAT Delhi
Find latest CESTAT Delhi judgments and orders on Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax covering classification, valuation, exemptions, CENVAT credit, refunds, demands and penalties.
Penalty u/s. 11AC r.w. Rule 25 cannot be imposed for suppression or contravention of facts unless it was made intentionally
Minimum penalty to be imposed under Central Excise Rules, 2002
Whether outgoing partners liable to pay excise duty assessed against a registered partnership firm, which was dissolved?
Bharat Box Factory Ltd. Versus Commissioner Of C. Ex., Jammu
CESTAT Delhi judgments and orders cover a wide range of disputes arising under Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax laws. This TaxGuru page compiles CESTAT Delhi case laws relating to classification, valuation, exemption notifications, CENVAT credit, refunds, imports and exports, service tax liability, duty and tax demands, limitation, interest, penalties, confiscation and procedural matters. The decisions are useful for businesses, importers, exporters, manufacturers, service providers, Chartered Accountants, advocates and other professionals researching indirect tax issues and appellate precedents. The collection includes recent Tribunal orders as well as important historical decisions under the Central Excise and Service Tax regimes that continue to be relevant to pending litigation and legal interpretation. TaxGuru maintains this dedicated CESTAT Delhi page to help readers conveniently search and follow Tribunal case law concerning Customs and other indirect taxes.
