Follow Us:

CESTAT Delhi

No Service Tas on Amount Recovered Towards Penalties: CESTAT Delhi

April 11, 2025 648 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi rules penalty amounts for contract breaches are not ‘services’ under Finance Act, thus not liable to service tax.

MCPCBs Classifiable as LED Components Under CTH 85340000, Not Lighting Fixtures Under CTH 94054090

April 9, 2025 1458 Views 0 comment Print

Aggrieved by this decision, assessee appealed to Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), who ruled in its favor, restoring the original classification under CTH 85340000 and setting aside the penalty and confiscation order.

CESTAT Delhi upheld duty demand on student almanac and teacher planner for normal period

April 8, 2025 366 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi held that duty demand on Student Almanac and teacher planner is uphold, however, extended period of limitation is not invocable since there was no evidence of intention to evade payment of duty and suppression of facts.

Exemption notification 146/94-Cus doesn’t impose ‘Actual User’ condition: CESTAT Delhi

April 8, 2025 825 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi held that exemption notification 146/94-Cus doesn’t state ‘Actual User’ condition. Accordingly, confiscation of imported arms and ammunitions is liable to be set aside.

NIDB data cannot form the basis for Enhancement of Value under Customs Act

April 3, 2025 1122 Views 0 comment Print

The aforementioned action by assessee implied that assessee had accepted the reassessment and enhancement. Consequently, the appropriate officer was not supposed to issue a speaking order in accordance with Section 17(5) of the Customs Act.

Customs Broker not required to verify correctness of certificates issued by government officer

April 1, 2025 1584 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi held that regulation 10(n) doesn’t mandate Customs Broker to verify correctness of certificate or registration issued by other concerned government officer. Thus, revocation of customs broker licence and forfeiture of security deposit are set aside.

Customs Broker not responsible if client fails to inform authorities post moving to new premises

March 26, 2025 3435 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi held that responsibility of the Customs Broker under Regulation 10(n) does not include keeping a continuous surveillance on the client. Thus, customs broker cannot be held responsible if client moves to new premises and doesn’t inform authorities.

Customs Officer not empowered to modify FOB value of goods: CESTAT Delhi

March 26, 2025 990 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi held that FOB value is the transaction value and customs officer has no right to interfere/ modify the FOB value of the goods. Thus, appeal of exporter’s allowed and order set aside.

Notification no. 36/2021-Customs doesn’t have retrospective effect: CESTAT Delhi

March 26, 2025 924 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi held that Amendment Notification no. 36/2021-Customs dated 19.07.2021 cannot be said to be retrospective in nature. Accordingly, orders are liable to be set aside and all the appeals are allowed.

Input Services Require Direct Nexus with Manufacturing Activity for CENVAT Credit Eligibility

March 8, 2025 1035 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi rules against Leel Electricals Ltd., denying CENVAT Credit on ineligible invoices. The tribunal upholds tax demand and penalty.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031