CESTAT Chennai rules in favor of Renault Nissan Automotive India, stating that their refund claim can’t be rejected for not opting for Provisional Assessment.
Dive into the RKM Powergen vs. Customs case. Learn how project import benefits can’t be denied if the contract registration process began before the goods’ importation.
CESTAT Chennai held that remand order of de novo adjudication being passed after 18 years is liable to be set aside as department failed to explain the humongous delay.
CESTAT Chennai remanded the matter back for de novo adjudication as appellant couldn’t obtain specific documents due to the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic.
CESTAT Chennai held that seizure of gold jewellery unjustified as revenue failed to establish beyond doubt that gold jewellery seized is of foreign origin.
Analysis of the CESTAT Chennai ruling in Paper and Allied Conversions vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, focusing on service tax on reimbursable expenses.
CESTAT Chennai held that as per Section 73A(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 monies collected as a tax, even if wrongly done, has to be deposited to Government.
CESTAT Chennai order in Vikram Trading Company and Commissioner of Customs -Why enhancement of imported goods’ value without proper reasons not sustainable.
Exploring the CESTAT Chennai decision in Nanda Agency Vs Commissioner of Customs on granting 6% interest for 253-day delay in customs duty refund.
CESTAT Chennai sets aside confiscation, fines, and customs duty demands against Benign International due to a lack of CLRI report. Read for comprehensive analysis.
