CESTAT Chennai held that penalty under section 114AA of the Customs Act is leviable on person who causes to be made, signed or used any false declaration or fraudulent document
CESTAT Chennai supports Fourrts India Laboratories, ruling that physician samples fall under Section 4 (1) (a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Dive into the details of this landmark decision.
Detailed analysis of Beach Minerals Company’s appeal against Commissioner of GST & Central Excise ruling. CESTAT Chennai orders fresh adjudication.
CESTAT Chennai held that tendering of an order to an unauthorized person or sending it without ‘registered post with acknowledgement due’ is not considered as a valid service of order. Accordingly, matter disposed of by way of remand.
CESTAT Chennai held that once the licencing authority has found that the licencing conditions have been fulfilled, it would not be open to the customs authorities too contend that the imports under the licence are contrary to law.
The primary issue in contention was the Service Tax demanded on GTA services and whether it’s applicable in cases where no overcharges are made beyond the actual freight charges.
CESTAT Chennai upholds rebate for Vedanta Ltd on exported Anode Slime. Excise Duty demand negated following clarification on duty applicability.
CESTAT Chennai held that order of revocation of license as authorized courier unjustified as appellant didn’t played any role the impugned smuggling of gold and other commercial goods.
Examine the verdict by CESTAT Chennai concerning Sri Saraswathi Propeller Works’ case against GST & Central Excise, focusing on excise duty on steel structures.
CESTAT Chennai upheld the quashing of Anti Dumping Duty (ADD) for imported Diethyl Thio Phosphoryl Chloride based on the Customs Tariff Act nuances.
