This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Non-Furnishing of Bond not amounts to Misdeclaration: CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Samarth Corporation Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Samarth Corporation Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
In a significant ruling, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Chennai has delivered a judgment in favor of Samarth Corporation against the Commissioner of Customs. The core issue revolves around the non-furnishing of a bond as mandated by an amendment to a Customs notification. The tribunal’s decision addresses whether such non-compliance amounts to misdeclaration, thereby scrutinizing the implications of demands for interest and penalties.
The controversy stemmed from Samarth Corporation’s ...





