This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Protest Ends with Judicial Order & Activates Section 27(1B)(b) Refund Claim Limitation: CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Gold Quest International Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Gold Quest International Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Introduction: The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Chennai has delivered a pivotal judgment concerning the period of limitation for refund claims under Section 27(1B) of the Customs Act, 1962. The case in question, Gold Quest International Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs, revolves around the appellant’s refund claim for import duty paid under protest, invoking critical analysis of legal provisions and precedents.
Detailed Analysis: The crux of the dispute hinged on whether the ...
Author Info
