Exploring the CESTAT Chennai decision in Nanda Agency Vs Commissioner of Customs on granting 6% interest for 253-day delay in customs duty refund.
CESTAT Chennai sets aside confiscation, fines, and customs duty demands against Benign International due to a lack of CLRI report. Read for comprehensive analysis.
CESTAT Chennai rules that Kadri Mills (CBE) Ltd. is not liable to pay tax on banking charges deducted by foreign banks. The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the judgment.
Exploring legal intricacies of Total Energies Marketing India Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise case ruled by CESTAT Chennai regarding LPG storage and service tax.
Analysis of the CESTAT Chennai order in Axon Drugs (P) Ltd Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise case. Discover why directing excise refund to Consumer Welfare Fund was deemed unjust.
CESTAT held that when there is doubt regarding documents, authority should seek clarification/explanation rather than relying on assumptions.
CESTAT Chennai held that imposition of penalty unwarranted as differential duty is already paid before issuance of show cause notice.
CESTAT Chennai held that amount already paid towards the duty liability and interest before issuance of show cause notice. Notice issued only for levying penalty is untenable. Hence, levy of penalty u/s. 78 deleted.
Explore the crucial legal battle between Arasan Amuthan Construction and the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax. Understand why no service tax is due on pre-2007 contracts according to CESTAT Chennai.
CESTAT Chennai held that penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 imposable as CHA has abetted or facilitated, may be deliberate or negligent, an illegal attempted export of prohibited goods i.e. Red Sanders wood pillars and tops.
