CESTAT Chennai held that imported goods being handheld machines popularly known as brush cutter is classifiable under CTH 84672900 and parts of brush cutter is classifiable under CTH 84679900.
Delve into Veneer Mills vs Commissioner of Customs case dissected by CESTAT Chennai, affirming SAD refund despite certificate dispute, with expert insights.
PS Bedi & Co Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs case analyzed. CESTAT Chennai sets aside confiscation of hand tools, deeming them capital goods under FTP.
In a case between Sree Gokulam Food and Beverages Pvt Ltd and the Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, CESTAT Chennai rules that MRP-based assessment applies only to mineral water and aerated water, not packaged drinking water.
CESTAT Chennai allows CENVAT credit for service tax paid on broadcasting fees by Radaan Media, setting a precedent for media production companies. Read the implications.
Explore why NIDB data alone isn’t enough for value determination as CESTAT Chennai annuls penalties in Gypsie Impex vs Customs case. Full analysis here.
CESTAT Chennai rules decoration balloons imported by Bubbly Balloons do not require BIS registration, setting aside the confiscation order by Customs.
CESTAT Chennai rules redemption fine cannot exceed market value in Vinayaga Traders vs Commissioner of Customs case, setting precedent for import disputes.
CESTAT Chennai dismisses Commissioner of Customs appeal, upholding Suguna Poultry Farm’s refund claim under section 26A of the Customs Act.
CESTAT Chennai sets aside revocation of Customs Broker license for Souparnika Shipping Services due to facilitating fraudulent import-export activities.
