CESTAT Bangalore rules that Finger Print Readers, having individual functions, cannot be classified under the CTH of Computer Accessories. Read the full order here.
A.P. Steel Re-Rolling Mills Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs: CESTAT orders release of HMS scrap after mutilation under customs supervision.
Read about CESTAT Bangalore’s ruling confirming separate classification for software licenses and software, allowing the benefit of nil customs duty rate.
Learn from CESTAT Bangalore’s ruling that a duty-free shop licensee must pay customs duty when violating Customs Act provisions. Analysis & implications explained.
CESTAT Bangalore rules reimbursable expenses not includable in taxable value for services under warranty, setting precedent for service tax assessments.
CESTAT Bangalore sets aside differential duty in Hazel Mercantile Ltd. vs Commissioner of Customs case, emphasizing no demand on undervaluation due to higher discount on import.
CESTAT Bangalore nullifies Rs. 1,00,000 penalty on B.K. Manjunath under Customs Act Section 114(1) due to lack of evidence in illegal export allegation.
CESTAT Bangalore clarifies that the ‘Let Export Order’ date is crucial for determining the customs duty rate on exports, impacting refund claims.
CESTAT Bangalore rules in favor of Minebea Intec, waiving customs penalty post voluntary duty payment before SCN issuance. Detailed insights here.
CESTAT Bangalore rules against UDL Logistics for not verifying exporter’s rep, imposing penalty. Full analysis of the case provided.
