In re M/s. Wiptech Peripheral pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Applicant has neither filed the application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-01 nor paid the required fees of Rs.10,000/- as required as per the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, […]
In re Maharaja Pratapsinh Coronation Gymkhana (GST AAR Gujarat) Application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-0 1, they have not paid the required fees of 10,000/- as required under the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 for not paying […]
In re Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC) (GST AAR Gujarat) In the present case the applicant is recipient of the services and not supplier of such services. Accordingly, the application is not liable for admission and therefore rejected without going in to the merits of the case. Instant application filed by M/s. Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC), […]
In re Micro Instruments (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The MAAAR rejected the Miscellaneous Application dated 25.09.2020 filed by the Applicant i.e. M/s. Micro Instrument, to restore their Application dated 21.08.2019 seeking Rectification of Mistake in the MAAAR Order No. MAH/AAAR/SS-RJ/26/2018-19 dated 22.03.2019, as the same had already been decided by the erstwhile Appellate Authority vide Order […]
In re Tirumala Milk Products Pvt Ltd. (GST AAAR Karnataka) in the instant appeal, the Appellant is aggrieved by the grounds on which the lower Authority has refused to admit the application for advance ruling which is that, the question on which the ruling was sought is a matter that is being investigated by the […]
In re Thirumalai Chemicals Limited (GST AAR Tamil Nadu) Q. The value to be adopted in respect of transfer to branches located outside the state? Ans: The applicant can adopt any one of the following three methods provided under Rule 28 of the CGST/ TNGST Rules 2017 read with Section 15 of the CGST/TNGST Act […]
In re Vallalar Borewells (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Q1. Whether the following supply of services provided by the applicant are in relation to agricultural operations directly in connection with raising of agricultural produce i.Drilling of Borewells for supply of water for agricultural operations like cultivation including seeding, planting and ploughing. ii. Letting out of compressors for […]
In re Aravind Drillers (GST AAR Tamil Nadu) 1. Drilling of Borewells for supply of water in agricultural land is not ‘Support Service for agriculture classifiable under ‘SAC 9986’ for the reasons stated in para 8.3 above 2. Letting out of compressors for pumping of water from the borewells to the agricultural field is not […]
In re M/s Faiveley Transport Rail Technologies India Limited (GST AAR Tamil Nadu) DGGSTI has taken up investigations on the classifications adopted by the applicant on their supplies to Indian Railways and classified under CTH 8607. The subject goods are supplied to `Indian Railways’ and the applicant classify the same under CTH 8607. The application […]
In re Sumeru Infra Solution (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) This Authority is of the view that based on the detailed reading and understanding of Section 97 of the CGST Act, an application for Advance Ruling can only be made to determine the ‘admissibility of input tax credit (ITC)‘ on any goods or services or both. […]
