Further, revenue also contested that whether the ld. CIT(A) was justified in treating the excise duty refund of Rs 1,63,15,661/- as capital receipt, which were earlier treated as revenue receipt, in the facts and circumstances of the case.
ITAT Mumbai held that capital gain arising out of sale of shares not taxable in the hands of foreign company since holding is less than 10% hence Article 14(4) of DTAA between India and Spain cannot be applied.
The ITAT Mumbai remands the case of Ashok Ghelabhai Patel for fresh examination after the assessee failed to provide adequate evidence for claimed expenses.
ITAT Mumbai quashes penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for Vijay Jewellers, citing estimated additions for bogus purchases. No concealment or inaccurate details found.
ITAT Bangalore held that there was no proper response during the assessment proceedings as well as in the appellate proceedings. Accordingly, issue remanded back to the file of AO subject to payment of costs of Rs. 5,000.
ITAT Rajkot reviews the PCIT’s revision under Section 263 regarding income classification in Jayshree Sarees case.
ITAT Rajkot allowed appeals by Saurashtra Cement on guest house maintenance costs for AY 2014-15 and 2015-16, overturning prior disallowances.
Atlantic Shipping Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) In a recent ruling by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Rajkot, the case of Atlantic Shipping Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer has brought to light critical issues regarding tax assessments for shipping companies operating in international waters and the applicability of the India-Singapore Double […]
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the addition under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act made without proper examination of the books of account and relevant financial records unjustified. Accordingly, order set aside and matter restored back.
ITAT Mumbai held that depreciation under section 32 of the Income Tax Act on the right to collect toll on the roads developed on BOT basis is not eligible.
