ITAT Mumbai quashes PCIT’s Section 263 revision order, ruling AO had duly examined filing fee expenditure for share capital increase in original assessment, thus no error.
ITAT Jaipur upheld CIT(A)’s decision to delete bogus purchase additions, validating a 13.05% profit rate declared by the assessee in the case.
ITAT Ahmedabad excused non-compliance due to CA’s failure, remanding the case for verification of additional evidence related to cash deposits and investments.
ITAT Mumbai rules that shares bought off-market and later sold on stock exchanges with proof of genuine transactions cannot be treated as unexplained income.
ITAT Delhi remands JCB India Ltd.’s ₹166.09 crore TP adjustment for non-UK royalty payments to TPO for fresh consideration.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that disallowance of interest expense by treating the same as unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Income Tax Act needs re-verification. Accordingly, matter send back to the file of jurisdictional AO.
ITAT Allahabad held that on account of inadvertent error in reporting by the tax auditor in form 3 CD this addition has been made while framing the assessment order u/s 143(1) by CPC, Bangalore, which is system oriented. Thus, matter remanded back to the file of AO.
Disallowance on dividend income claimed by ICICI Prudential Life Insurance was deleted as Section 44, being a non-obstante clause, overrides the provisions of Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in computing income for life insurance companies.
TPO proposed transfer pricing adjustments of INR 1,03,26,939/-. According to TPO, appellant had advance funds to its AE [i.e. Golden Harvest Middle East (FZC)] under the grab of share application money and there was inordinate delay in allotment of shares.
Assessee was in the business of construction and in developing housing complexes i.e to construct the property and sell it therefore, unsold flats held as stock-in-trade should be treated as business stock, not income from house property.
