ITAT Jaipur remanded the matter back to the file of AO since ex-parte order was passed due to non-appearance/ non-furnishing of response since assessee died during pendency of the proceedings.
ITAT Bangalore held that since assessee filed voluminous documents in paperbooks during the course of hearing before ITAT, the matter is remitted back to CIT(A) for consideration of documents furnished by the assessee and fresh decision as per law.
ITAT Surat held that employee’s contribution towards PF and ESI cannot be allowed if it is deposited after the due dates under those Acts but before filing of return. Accordingly, disallowance u/s. 36(1)(va) confirmed and appeal dismissed.
ITAT Agra held that dismissal of appeal as per provisions of section 249(4)(b) for non-payment of advance tax unjustified since entre addition made by AO was challenged and there was no other income which is above threshold limit of being taxable.
The case was selected for limited scrutiny through CASS. AO observed that the assessee had also from other sources and also from agricultural activities carried out during the year
ITAT Ahmedabad held that registration to trust under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act granted since assessee demonstrated that exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act is not claimed. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Delhi remands penalty under Section 271AAB for reassessment, linking it to reconsidered quantum addition. Fresh proceedings ordered for compliance.
ITAT dismisses Revenue’s tax appeal due to jurisdiction issues, allowing the revenue to approach the appropriate bench for further action.
ITAT partly allows agricultural income claim for Jesal Jatin Desai but upholds disallowance of a portion due to lack of evidence.
ITAT restores the matter to AO for fresh assessment, allowing the assessee to submit additional evidence in Simmi Madan v. ITO case.
