ITAT Ahmedabad order in Maheshbhai Nagjibhai Desai Vs ITO case, addressing reopening under Section 147 and unexplained investments under Section 69.
ITAT Ahmedabad directs benefit of Rs. 8 lakhs for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization in the case of Manan Kiritbhai Shah for AY 2017-18.
ITAT Ahmedabad refers the case of Dharmendra Sheth HUF back to AO after CIT(A) dismisses appeal due to delay, for a de novo assessment process.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands case on unexplained investments of ₹18.19L in land & shares. Tribunal directs re-examination by AO after Assessee presents evidence.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that denial of Foreign Tax Credit [FTC] on the ground that corresponding income has not been offered for tax in the year under appeal is not justifiable. Accordingly, FTC allowed.
ITAT Kolkata addresses procedural lapses in Suryadeo Prasad Vs. ITO, highlighting the need for a speaking order and adherence to Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act.
On appeal CIT (A) held that disallowance u/s 10AA can be made only when the total income is enhanced by the AO or TPO. Co-ordinate bench has already decided this issue for AY 2014-15 and disallowance u/s 10AA was deleted.
CIT(E) was not justified in denying assessee’s applications for final registration u/s 12AB / final approval u/s 80G as assessee had done only charitable activities till now and not undertaken any activity contemplated by object No. 2 & 3.
An amendment to the agreement on September 24, 2014, revised the terms of consideration. Assessee argued that possession of the property was never transferred as evidenced by ownership documents like the 7/12 extract and electricity bills.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition on grounds other than grounds forming part of reasons recorded for reopening of assessment not justified. Accordingly, addition towards unexplained investment which didn’t form part of reasons liable to be deleted.
