Case Law Details
Case Name : Arnab Kumar Goswami Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Kolkata
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Arnab Kumar Goswami Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Conclusion: AO failed to obtain requisite approval from PCCIT under section 151 for issuance of reassessment notice under section 148 beyond 3 years, the proceedings were deemed to be non-compliance to the statutory requirement under the law and the consequent additions made by AO were also not justified.
Held: Assessee, declared an income of Rs. 3,52,310/- for the assessment year. He purchased a property at Rajarhat for Rs. 25,00,000/-, while the stamp duty value was Rs. 35,36,655/-. The difference
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.