Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arnab Kumar Goswami Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Arnab Kumar Goswami Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

Conclusion: AO failed to obtain requisite approval from PCCIT under section 151 for issuance of reassessment notice under section 148 beyond 3 years, the proceedings were deemed to be non-compliance to the statutory requirement under the law and the consequent additions made by AO were also not justified.

Held: Assessee, declared an income of Rs. 3,52,310/- for the assessment year. He purchased a property at Rajarhat for Rs. 25,00,000/-, while the stamp duty value was Rs. 35,36,655/-. The difference

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31