ITAT Rajkot rules on Section 80P deduction for co-operative societies, stating it cannot be denied solely due to a belated income tax return filing.
ITAT Surat partially upholds cash addition for Arjunsinh Thakor but reduces taxable amount and applies pre-amendment tax rates under Section 115BBE.
ITAT Jabalpur rules on excess stock as undisclosed income and sets tax rates for survey income and cash credits, citing Vatika Township precedent.
ITAT Mumbai dismisses Revenue’s appeal against Thirumalai Marketing & Investments Ltd., upholding the assessee’s proof of the lender’s identity and creditworthiness for a Rs. 5 crore loan.
Bangalore ITAT remands Om Prakash Girgaonkar’s appeal to AO, citing potential double addition on property purchase and unverified cash deposits.
ITAT Mumbai held that depreciation of amalgamating company cannot be disallowed merely for non-filing of Form No. 62 which is only directory. Thus, non-compliance of the same would not disentitle the assessee to claim carry forward losses to be set off. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that revisionary proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act justified since PCIT correctly observed that the very basis of disallowance of depreciation was on an incorrect understanding of the facts by AO. Accordingly, revision order upheld.
ITAT Delhi held that claim of interest u/s. 24b of the Income Tax Act was duly examined during original as well as reassessment proceedings. Thus, the plausible view having been taken by the AO cannot be held to be prejudicial to the interests of Revenue.
ITAT Mumbai held that denial of exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act on account of non-utilization of consideration not justified as utilization done within extended time limit for making the investment under the TOLA. Accordingly, exemption u/s. 54 granted and appeal allowed.
ITAT Raipur set aside ex-parte order passed by CIT(A) since the reason for non-compliance by the assessee before CIT(A)/NFAC was that the hearing notices have been sent in the wrong email id by the department. Accordingly, matter of accommodation entries remanded back to CIT(A).
