Ahmedabad ITAT rules against Section 56(2)(x) addition for Deepakkumar Chandulal Shah, citing a title dispute that justified a lower sale price and a stamp duty value difference within the 5% threshold.
Pune Zilha Madhyawarti Sahakari Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune held that revisionary order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act is liable to be quashed as AO conducted detailed enquiry and after proper application of mind has taken one of the view legally permissible and concluded the assessment. Accordingly, appeal allowed. Facts- The […]
ITAT Mumbai rules employee contributions to PF/ESI are disallowed if deposited after statutory due dates, even if before ITR due date, upholding Section 36(1)(va).
ITAT Raipur dismisses Shivam Attires’ appeal, upholding disallowance of late PF/ESIC deductions, citing Supreme Court’s Checkmate Services ruling.
ITAT Bangalore remands Kodavaame Trust’s 12AB and 80G tax exemption cancellation to CIT(E) for fresh consideration due to submitted documents.
ITAT Pune cancels Section 271(1)(c) penalty against Vikas Jayram Bhukan, citing a defective notice that failed to specify the charge, referencing Bombay High Court precedents.
The ITAT Ahmedabad has partially upheld an appeal by Parshwanath Realty Pvt. Ltd., allowing 25% of exhibition expenses incurred for a related firm, citing business expediency and indirect benefit.
Assessee is a co-operative society engaged in the business of providing credit facilities to its members. Assessee is claiming deduction u/s. 80P(2) of the Income Tax Act. Notably, vide intimation u/s. 143(1), the deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) was disallowed.
ITAT Cochin rules Envestnet Asset Management’s assessment order time-barred, emphasizing mandatory timelines and proper record-keeping by tax authorities.
ITAT Mumbai remands Gabriel India’s tax appeal over Rs. 72 lakh capital work-in-progress dispute. CIT(A) ordered to admit new evidence.
