Follow Us:

All ITAT

Exemption to Trust U/s. 11 of Income Tax Act can not be denied if Payment made to concerns covered U/s. 13(3) not excessive

February 25, 2011 6015 Views 0 comment Print

DDIT(E)-II Vs. M/s. Rock Church Ministries (ITAT Hyderabad ) The purpose of section 13(1)(c) is to deprive a religious or charitable trust from exemption if it is found that its income is used or applied, directly or indirectly, for the benefit of the specified persons. Section 13(1)(c) carves out a general exception wherein the provisions of sections 11 and 12 will not operate on account of user or application of any income of the trust for any direct or indirect benefit of the any specified persons. It is an undisputed fact that the rent paid of Rs. 9,500 is not excessive even as per the old provisions of municipal. The assessee paid the rent as per the old municipal taxes. The present rental value would be much more than the rent paid by the assessee for the property having a building of 4000 sq. Ft. on a land admeasuring 15,000 sq. ft. that too in a prime locality in the city of Hyderabad. The market rent i.e., Rs. 80,000 per month as estimated by the Government Valuer is much more to the rent paid by the assessee. The Assessing Officer could not establish that the rent paid by the assessee is excessive and the rental value estimated by the Government valuer is incorrect. The contention of the Revenue that there is variation in the name in the municipal records and I.T. records is also baseless as the name in the municipal records is in abbreviated form.

Denial of deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of I-T Act, 1961

February 23, 2011 4713 Views 0 comment Print

The assessee is, admittedly, neither a `primary agricultural credit society’ nor a `primary cooperative agricultural and rural development bank’. As such, it is not covered by the exceptions to s. 80P(4), as provided by the said sub-section itself, denying deduction u/s. 80P to all cooperative banks. The Legislature in its wisdom restricted the exemption, which extends to the whole of the specified incomes, i.e., of cooperatives societies undertaking specified activities, w.e.f. 1/4/2007 to the said two primary units, where the assessee is a cooperative bank. The assessee in the instant case being an apex cooperative society lending money to such primary units functioning within the State of Kerala, he denied the assessee its claim for deduction u/s. 80P (2)(a)(i).

Transfer Pricing – Circumstance when Assessee not entitled to adjustment of 5 per cent as stipulated u/s 92C(2)

February 20, 2011 732 Views 0 comment Print

The assessee is not entitled to adjustment of 5 per cent as stipulated u/s 92C(2), where only one of the several methods specified u/s 92C(1) is applied by the assessee to determine the arm’s length price

Salary taxable only if it accrues in India

February 20, 2011 1862 Views 0 comment Print

Whether salary credited to a bank account in India for services rendered there by a non-resident was taxable in India?

Unrealised loss on outstanding interest rate swaps would be allowable as business deduction

February 20, 2011 2281 Views 0 comment Print

This decision is relevant to assessees following RBI guidelines for accounting for interest rates swaps. Companies which are claiming unrealised loss on outstanding interest rate swaps at the year end would find this ruling useful. While this ruling

Payments to overseas telecommunication service providers towards provision of International Private Leased Circuit/ dedicated bandwidth to be taxable as Royalty

February 20, 2011 2968 Views 0 comment Print

The Chennai Tribunal has held that payments towards IPLC / dedicated bandwidth are towards use of ‘equipment’ or ‘process’ and therefore would qualify as royalty under the Act as well as DTAA. It may be noted that the proposition on ‘process’ eleme

Transfer Pricing- CUP method (the traditional transaction method) is preferable to the other methods

February 20, 2011 3077 Views 0 comment Print

In principle, the CUP method (the traditional transaction method) is preferable to the other methods because all other things being equal, the CUP and traditional transactional methods lead to more reliable results vis-a-vis the results obtained by a

ITAT Delhi Rules Activity of giving micro-finance and earning interest is “charitable purpose”

February 20, 2011 925 Views 0 comment Print

The learned CIT has also given one more reason that it is not comprehensible as to why not the assessee got itself registered as a society,if the motive of the assessee was to do activities of public charity. This reason given by the CIT is found, in

When assessee sub-contracts work in progress and AO examines all the claims u/s 143(3), in such a situation, CIT is not right in invoking revisionary powers u/s 263

February 18, 2011 636 Views 0 comment Print

Pyramid Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) – The issues taken up by the CIT for revision of assessment under section 263 of the Act, namely, work-in-progress & closing stock, opening stock, and dis-allowance of expenditure on account of various heads, have already been considered by the assessing officer in the assessment proceedings under section 143(3) of the Act.

Brought forward business losses can be set off against the gains arising from any business or profession, though chargeable to tax under any other head of income

February 18, 2011 3423 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that income earned by the taxpayer on sale of factory building, plant and machinery although not taxable as “Profit and gains of business or profession” was in the nature of income of business though assessed as capital gains and h

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930