ITAT Jaipur held that non-deposit of employees contribution to ESI and PF within due date as per the respective Act is disallowance by invoking provisions of section 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Jaipur rules in favor of Rakesh Sharma, rejecting the addition of Rs. 22,54,250 under Section 69 for AY 2008-09, emphasizing the genuineness of bank transfers and cash withdrawals for cash deposits.
ITAT Kolkata held that revisionary proceedings u/s. 263 initiated in the name of non-existent entity, despite the fact that private limited company was converted into LLP and the conversion was brought to the knowledge of AO, is void ab initio and invalid.
Explore the landmark ITAT Delhi ruling in Finesse Intl. Design Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT. CBDT Circular violation deems assessment order invalid. Know more!
ITAT Jaipur held that initiation of penalty proceedings u/s. 271AAB(1A) of the Income Tax Act without specifying the ground and default on the part of the assessee and also without specifying the undisclosed income on which penalty was proposed to be levied is unsustainable-in-law.
ITAT Kolkata held that once the TDS is deducted then the liability resulting from the non-deposit of TDS by the deductor cannot be fasten on the deductee. Hence, denial of TDS credit to deductee unjustified.
Explore the Shree Swami Samarth Seva Kendra vs ITO case at ITAT Mumbai. Analysis reveals the importance of Form 10 compliance for securing Section 11(2) benefits.
Read the detailed analysis of Maheshwar Niketan Co-operative Housing Society Limited vs. ITO case. ITAT Mumbai grants relief for CA’s email ID failure on the Income Tax portal.
Explore the ITAT Hyderabad’s order in Puligilla Purnachander Vs ITO case for insights on Income Tax Act Section 69A, gross sales, and demonetization deposits.
Read the detailed analysis of O Clock Software Pvt Ltd vs. ACIT case by ITAT Chennai. Learn why deduction was denied for delayed PF/ESI payment under section 36(1)(va).
