Read the full text of the ITAT Kolkata order in the case of Pan Emami Cosmed Limited vs. DCIT. The denial of LTCG exemption overturned, directing AO to allow after examination.
The key issue is whether the salary, directly remitted from a foreign company to the assessee’s Non-Resident External (NRE) account in India, is taxable in India.
ITAT) Agra delivered a significant judgment in the case of Arvind Singh Chauhan Vs ITO, challenging the taxability of salary received by an employee working on international routes.
TAT) Delhi in case of Chandan Lal Goswami vs. ITO sheds light on the eligibility of employees holding civil posts under a State for gratuity exemption under Section 10(10)(i) of Income Tax Act, 1961.
Explore the ITAT Mumbai ruling in PMI Entertainment vs ACIT case, where the death of director and CA led to filing delay appeal. Detailed analysis and insights.
Addition made under Section 69 on account of the difference in excess stock of 22 Kt Gold and Polki Jewellery was not justified as the total weight of items of 22KT Gold jewelry and 22KT Gold Polki jewelry was 36,943 gms, and as per the estimated value, the difference was merely 113.50 gms, which was 0.32%.
Explore the ITAT Delhi order in ACIT Vs Vibha Taneja case for A.Y. 2014-15. Learn how the CIT(A) defended the assessee against unexplained money addition, citing possession and registered sale deed.
Addition under section 69A on account of actual cash arranged/paid by assessee to HKA was available with the assessee was not justified as “ownership” of money had not been recorded in the books of account and AO had made only presumption that the said cash was ‘available with the assessee’ without bringing on record any material in support thereof.
Explore the legal battle of Shadawal Enterprises vs CIT in ITAT Mumbai. Analysis of unexplained expenses, eviction, and conclusion. Learn about the crucial remand for a fair decision
The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) order passed without Document Identification Number (DIN) number should be treated as invalid and was contrary to the CBDT Circular No.19/2019 dated 14th August 2019 as it was clear in the body of DRP order, no DIN number was mentioned nor there was any reason of not mentioning the DIN number in order of the DRP.
