ITAT Mumbai held that addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act by treating transaction of sale of shares of Sunrise Asian as a bogus penny stock unsustainable as material on records supports genuineness of the transactions.
ITAT Mumbai rules no addition under section 68 based on turnover declared under section 44 AD of Income Tax Act for Kalpesh Kantilal Gada. Detailed analysis and order explained.
Read about Rajesh Laxmikanth Varnerkar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) case where the assessee couldn’t reach the tax consultant due to business dislocation, leading to a remand order under section 250 of the Income Tax Act.
Read the full text of the ITAT Bangalore order on Aijaz Ahmed Suri Vs ITO regarding demonetization deposits. Analysis and conclusion included.
In the ITAT Delhi case I.T.O Vs Placid Buildwell Pvt Ltd, the addition u/s 68 was deemed invalid as creditworthiness was proven. Detailed analysis here.
Understand Section 80-IA(4) deductions: N.C.C. – M.S.K.E.L (J.V.) Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Ahmedabad) clarifies eligibility for developers.
Explore the ITAT Delhi’s ruling on cash deposits during demonetization in the case of Shivam Industries Radheshyam Sharma & Co. Vs ACIT for AY 2017-18.
In Ajit Chandrashekar Dighe Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai), learn about the importance of substantiating Form 26AS or Form 16 for claiming TDS credit. Detailed analysis provided.
Analysis of Satbir Mahato Vs PCIT case by Kolkata ITAT, highlighting the dispute over Section 263 jurisdiction due to plausible views of AO.
Mool Chand Aggarwal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) CIT(A) cannot disbelieve cash book only on the ground that ‘generally individuals do not maintain cash book and it is not mandatory to maintain cash book for the individual’.
