Learn about the Kolkata ITAT ruling on compensatory vs. penal nature of environmental compensation payments in Majhaulia Sugar Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO case.
In Ambience Pvt Ltd vs ITO (ITAT Delhi), the issue of TDS penalty under sec 271C is discussed. Analysis reveals why penalty wasn’t justified due to a bonafide belief.
Kolkata ITAT rules in favor of Dream Valley Barter Pvt. Ltd., stating no addition under Section 68 for share premium if taxpayer proves identity and creditworthiness.
Kolkata ITAT justifies addition u/s 68 in ITO Vs Mangalvani Commercial Pvt. Ltd. for unexplained share capital & premium. Detailed analysis of the case provided.
In a case before ITAT Delhi, it was ruled that payment made overseas for tariff information does not constitute ‘FTS’, hence no TDS deduction under section 195 is warranted.
Explore the ITAT Ahmedabad ruling on Intas Pharmaceuticals Vs ACIT, focusing on working capital adjustment and notional interest on trade receivables.
Mumbai ITAT ruled that a rectification order passed in the name of a non-existent entity, despite being aware of its merger, is invalid. Full analysis here.
Tribunal upheld the appellate order and dismissed the appeals filed by the Assessing Officer, as the assessment orders against the non-existent company were not sustainable.
Explore crucial rulings in case of Interglobe Technology Quotient Pvt Ltd vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) regarding CSR expenditure disallowance and TDS credit allowance, along with detailed analysis.
ITAT Chennai rules that recoveries of farmers’ advances reflected in cash books are not unexplained cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
