Summary of the ITAT Jaipur decision in Singhal Builders Vs ACIT for A.Y. 2017-18, discussing income additions, depreciation claims, and treatment of interest on income tax refund.
ITAT Bangalore held that interest/ dividend from co-operative society is eligible for deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act. However, if payer bank is co-operative bank then deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) is not available.
ITAT Jaipur upheld the deletion of Rs. 72 lakh addition, ruling that the assessee sufficiently explained the source of cash deposits made during demonetization.
ITAT Chennai quashes penalty under sections 271(1)(c) and 271A for AY 2012-13 to 2016-17 in the Srinivasan Chandrasekara case, citing legal deficiencies.
ITAT Delhi held that addition towards undisclosed investment in shares and unsecured loans merely based on observation made by DCIT without independent inquiry by AO is unjustified and hence the addition is liable to be deleted.
ITAT Delhi held that addition based on reliance placed on third party statement without any corroborated evidence is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, issue restored to AO for de novo adjudication.
Understand the ITAT Chennai ruling on valid claims for Long-Term Capital Gains. Learn the tax implications of property sale, liabilities, and deductions under Section 48.
ITAT Bangalore directed AO that claim in respect of interest on fixed deposits if any is not allowed u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act has to be considered in accordance with law by allowing the expenditure u/s. 57 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai finds the reopening of Allied Engineers’ assessment invalid, ruling the addition of alleged bogus purchases unjustified. Case closed.
ITAT Chennai overturns addition of Rs. 28.57 Lacs for cash deposits by Gouthamchand Jain, ruling the source as valid and directing a reassessment.
