Follow Us:

All ITAT

ITAT Imposes ₹1000 Fine for Non-Appearance in Income Tax Case

October 6, 2024 1290 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Bangalore imposes ₹1000 fine on taxpayer for non-appearance during assessment proceedings, payable to the PM Relief Fund. Case remitted for fresh consideration

ITAT Pune Invalidates Unsigned NFAC Order, Remands Case

October 6, 2024 1023 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Pune invalidates unsigned NFAC order, remanding case for re-adjudication under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Case to be heard afresh.

CIT(A) cannot dismiss appeal on account of non-prosecution: ITAT remands Matter

October 6, 2024 693 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Delhi remands Anil Dugal’s case back to Assessing Officer for failing to address Rs. 11 Cr unexplained credits and other issues due to Covid-19.

ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) Due to COVID-19 Delay

October 6, 2024 408 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Bangalore remands Meghana Satish Shetty’s case to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, citing COVID-19 related delays and extended gaps in hearing notices.

Mere change of opinion on the part of AO is not a valid ground for reassessment

October 6, 2024 852 Views 0 comment Print

The ITAT Nagpur discusses capital gains tax implications in ACIT Vs KSR Transport, highlighting issues in assessment and re-assessment procedures.

No Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance for delayed Form 15G & 15H submission

October 6, 2024 906 Views 0 comment Print

The ITAT Nagpur overturned an income tax disallowance in Ghalani’s case due to late filing of Form 15G/H, citing valid legal grounds.

No penalty for higher gratuity exemption claim due to misunderstanding of law

October 6, 2024 1116 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Nagpur quashed the penalty on Ravindra Kharche, finding no misreporting of income due to bona fide claims regarding gratuity exemption.

ITAT Mumbai Remands Case back to CIT(A) Due to Improper Notice by ITO

October 6, 2024 846 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Mumbai remands case of Aravind Arunachalam Vellore against ITO for lack of proper notice and communication during appeal process.

Penalties should not be imposed for genuine errors or debatable claims: ITAT Pune

October 5, 2024 3441 Views 0 comment Print

Hon’ble ITAT Pune rules that penalties under Section 271(1)(c) should not be imposed for genuine mistakes or debatable claims in tax assessments.

No addition of unexplained jewellery as CBDT Instruction 1916 allows Jewellery Holding for other Family Members

October 5, 2024 9702 Views 0 comment Print

Assessee challenged CIT(A) order before the Bangalore Bench of ITAT arguing that 1450 grams of gold should not be considered unexplained as it fell within the permissible limits of CBDT Instruction No. 1916.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930