Delhi HC overturned ₹2.33 crore GST demand due to non-receipt of SCN and inaccessible GST portal after director’s death and business closure.
This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assails the Assessment Order dated 27 March, 2024 passed by Respondent No.2 under the provisions of Section 144 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Delhi High Court held that department need to comply with the order of the Tribunal in passing a fresh assessment order within the time limit prescribed under section 153(3) of the Income Tax Act. Thus, notices initiating fresh assessment set aside.
Allahabad High Court ruled that excess stock found during inspection cannot justify confiscation under Section 130 of the GST Act. Case: Vijay Trading Co. vs. Commissioner.
Court rules against retrospective GST registration cancellation due to lack of notice and reasoning, emphasizing principles of natural justice.
Madras HC directs reassessment of GST demand and mandates a 10% pre-deposit. The original order was beyond the scope of the show cause notice.
Madras HC upholds reversal of ITC in Vijay Impex case, finds no violation of natural justice despite petitioner’s compliance with Circular No. 183.
The Bombay High Court quashed the 2023 order against Kabir Traders, remanding the case for reconsideration and reversing a debited amount of ₹8,15,489.
Calcutta HC grants small retailer another chance to restore GST registration, subject to filing overdue returns and paying dues within three weeks.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that excess stock in a GST survey should trigger proceedings under Sections 73 & 74, not confiscation under Section 130.
