The revenue, the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), West Bengal is the appellant. They are aggrieved by the order passed in WPO 334 of 2024 dated 07.05.2024 filed by the first respondent herein.
Held that the land in question was purchased as an agricultural land and at the time of survey, it was also not in dispute that the proceedings of Section 143 of UPZA and LR Act were not initiated and the land in question was not declared as an abadi land.
Rajasthan High Court held that the doctrine of proportionality cannot be invoked in cases where the root of the employment itself is based upon a forged document. Thus, quantum of punishment imposed by Disciplinary Authority not interfered.
Andhra Pradesh High Court, in the matter cancellation of GST registration on allegation of availment of Input Tax Credit without actual receipt of goods, has dismissed the present writ on the ground of availability of alternative remedy.
Bombay High Court held that if the party is able to show the proof of supply to SEZ Unit, then non-submission of “Bill of Export” cannot be treated as non-discharge of proof of Export Obligation.
Kerala High Court held that condonation application for delay in filing the audit report in Form-10B should have been considered without being too hyper technical and in a judicious manner.
Madras High Court directs reassessment of Murugan Metals’ GST demand, requiring 5% remittance and allowing submission of additional documents.
MP High Court dismisses RCC Infraventures’ GST writ petition, advising appeal before appropriate authority in Lucknow.
Madras High Court orders reconsideration of ITC claim dispute, finding prior order ignored petitioner’s reply and evidence.
Madras High Court reviews whether seized cash can be refunded if a show cause notice demands its appropriation against tax liability. Detailed case analysis included.
