Rajasthan High Court held that in absence of migration, petitioner unable to login GST common portal due to which returns not uploaded and tax not deposited. Accordingly, authorities directed to immediately allow petitioner to login on GST portal.
Delhi HC directs GST department to provide requested documents to petitioner for appeal purposes in case Nishant Tandon Vs Commissioner. Legal matter involves GST registration.
Himachal Pradesh HC held that the State and Central Governments have been extended the same powers under the CGST and SGST Act and if one of the officers has already initiated proceedings, the same cannot be transferred to another.
Assessee claimed that in section 14A, the disallowance of expenditure even if computed in accordance with Rule 8D could not exceed the exempt income earned in that year.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that interest can be waived in case the circumstances are beyond the control of the assessee in filing return in time. Accordingly, interest u/s. 234-A of the Income Tax Act waived.
Delhi High Court held that initiation of customs recovery proceedings against a dead person is unsustainable and liable to be quashed. Accordingly, recovery proceedings quashed.
Madras High Court held that initiation of recovery proceedings based on ex-parte order passed without considering the submissions is unjustified. Accordingly, writ allowed and CIT(A) directed to dispose of appeal.
Delhi High Court held that reinitiating of reassessment action u/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act on the same set of reasons on which assessment proceedings had already been concluded is unjustified and hence liable to be set aside.
Madras High Court held that work contracts undertaken prior to 11.05.2002 cannot be brought under the purview of the tax net under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Accordingly, order set aside.
Madras High Court quashes GST show cause notice for one-day delay in GSTR-3B filing due to COVID-19. Extension recommended by GST Council considered key.
