Madras High Court issues interim orders in A. Venkatachalam vs Assistant Commissioner case on GST levy on royalty, awaiting decision by Supreme Court’s Constitution Bench.
In the case of Income Tax Officer Ward 1(3)(7), Surat v. Durlabhbhai Kanubhai Rajpara [2020] 114 com 481 (Guj.), Court had set aside the reassessment proceedings on the ground that no valid notice under Section 148 could be issued against a dead person.
Delhi High Court held that cancellation of GST registration does not affect the taxpayer’s liability under relevant enactments. This, application for cancellation of GST registration allowed since petitioner has stopped carrying on its business.
Explore the Bombay High Court’s ruling on Pall India Pvt Ltd’s goods classification dispute with the Union of India. Key points and implications discussed.
Gujarat High Court examines whether certified copy submission in GST appeals is mandatory under amended GST Rules 108 and 109, following RGS Impex’s petition.
Gujarat HC quashes VAT Tribunal’s orders on pre-deposit in THA Vrajlal Tribhovandas case, restoring the revision application under VAT Act without pre-deposit.
Andhra Pradesh High Court upholds dismissal of GST appeals filed beyond statutory limits in Venkateswara Rao Kesanakurti vs. State of Andhra Pradesh.
Merely uploading notices and orders under View Additional Notices & Orders section without direct communication to taxpayer did not amount to proper service of SCN.
Fees collected by the agricultural market committee for its services were not tax and was generally defined to be a charge for a special service rendered to individuals by some Governmental agency.
Reassessment notice issued to assessee by AO was quashed due to non-compliance with the statutory requirement of providing a minimum of seven days for the taxpayer to furnish a reply under Section 148A(b).
