Rajasthan High Court dismisses CIT appeal against Satish Kumar Agarwal. Appeal non-maintainable due to CBDT Circular 9 of 2024. Tax dispute involved Section 54B & 50C.
Allahabad HC quashed HCL Infotech Ltd’s Show Cause Notice under CGST Act for lacking jurisdiction and necessary allegations.
Calcutta HC ruled that isolated private loans do not require a license under the West Bengal Money Lenders Act, 1940. Case decreed for repayment with interest.
Simply writing I am satisfied in the approval u/s 151 of Income-tax Act,1961 is sufficient to show that Sanctioning authority applied its mind while approving reassessment proceedings u /s 148 of Income-tax Act,1961
Madras High Court held that finalizing of assessment without considering reply and in absence of personal hearing is against the principles of natural justice. Accordingly, order set aside.
Patna High Court held that petitioner cannot be deprived of the benefit due to non-constitution of the Tribunal accordingly, petitioner must be extended statutory benefit of stay u/s. 112(9) of Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act.
Jammu Kashmir High Court held that the time limit for refund of GST u/s. 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 will be determined from the date the original application came to be filed by the petitioner concern and not from the date of follow-up application.
The respondents, on the other hand, would urge us to hold that a failure to place the amalgamated entity on notice was curable and one which would fall within the ambit of Section 292B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Gauhati High Court set aside the order as passed without affording due opportunity and against the principles of natural justice since the notice under CGST Act, 2017 was issued to incorrect address.
Madras High Court held that Powder Coating products like yokes, links and tubes amounts to works contract and hence the same is liable to tax under section 15(1) of the Puducherry Value Added Tax Act, 2007.
