Allahabad HC ruled that GST goods can’t be seized or penalized for taking a different route during transit if documents are genuine. Case: Exide Industries Ltd.
The Petitioner has paid the differential duty under the protest. Thus, vide the present petition, the petitioner challenges the impugned Press Release dated 15.07.2020 and the impugned show cause notice cum demand notice dated 17.04.2023.
By an Order dated 20th October, 2023, Respondent No. 1 rejected the Petitioner’s Application for condonation of delay of 80 days in filing the Return of Income. It is this Order dated 20th October,2023 which has been impugned in the present Petition.
Aggrieved by the relief granted by CIT(A) to assessee, Revenue preferred Appeal before ITAT for the assessment years under consideration and against the deletion of additions made by AO. ITAT dismissed the appeal.
Bombay HC dismisses appeal in CIT-13 Vs Shyam R. Pawar case, upholding Tribunal’s decision on share transaction dispute.
Allahabad High Court sets aside the GST cancellation order against Technosun India Pvt. Ltd., allowing the petitioner to file a fresh reply and receive a new order.
Allahabad High Court quashes GST order against Katyal Industries for failure to follow natural justice, allowing the petitioner to file a fresh reply.
Allahabad High Court quashes GST demand and appeal orders citing violation of Section 75(4) and natural justice. Case remanded for fresh adjudication.
Assessee contended that the complaint filed by Respondent No.3 had not stated about the boundaries of Plot No 14 and there was no clarity as to from which side the encroachment was alleged to be carried out.
Rajasthan High Court rules on Power and Instrumentation (Guj) Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner CGST case, addressing Section 73 vs 74 of CGST Act in tax disputes.
