Delhi High Court hears a suit regarding a business dispute between directors of Paramount Coaching Centre involving allegations of setting up a competing venture.
Uttarakhand High Court held that order is invalid since the same is passed invoking the provisions of rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 [CGST Rules] after the same was omitted on 8th October 2004.
Madras High Court overturns wilful defaulter tag on former IAS officer, citing lack of evidence linking him to company’s financial fraud.
Court dismisses writ petition against a GST show cause notice for ₹4.37 Cr, citing the rule of alternate remedy. Decision references Supreme Court rulings on bypassing statutory appeals.
Bombay High Court held that as per the terms and conditions of the agreement, the assessee was required to pay 5% of the receipt of the assessee and not on 5% of the gross advertising bills. Accordingly, infrastructure fee deduction restricted to 5% of receipt.
Allahabad High Court sets aside a ₹50k GST demand issued in the name of a deceased proprietor, ruling proceedings against a dead person are void ab initio.
Patna High Court held that extended period of limitation of five years under proviso to Sub-Section (1) of Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 in as much as transactions were not disclosed in ST-3 and relevant information were not provided to taxing authority.
Patna High Court held that order passed by the State Authority sustained since that there is no violation of principles of natural justice much less any violation of the statutory provisions as contained in sub-section (4) of Section 75 of the CGST/ BGST Act, 2017.
Allahabad High Court sets aside a tax demand against Vibhuti Tyres, citing a violation of Section 75(7) of the GST Act as the final demand exceeded the show-cause notice amount.
Allahabad High Court sets aside a GST demand on Priya Enterprises, citing denial of a mandatory personal hearing after the taxpayer replied to the show cause notice. Case remanded to tax authorities.
