Calcutta High Court dismisses revenue’s appeal in PCIT vs. Sitka Mercantile, affirming ITAT’s deletion of Section 68 addition. Court finds no substantial question of law in factual findings.
Calcutta High Court dismisses revenue’s appeal against ITAT order for AY 2012-13 in PCIT vs. Maninya Comfin Pvt. Ltd., finding no substantial question of law.
Rajasthan High Court dismisses GST writ for bypassing appeal route. Petitioner failed to explain delay in challenging tax order under RGST/CGST Act.
Delhi High Court held that GST SCN uploaded on ‘Additional Notices Tab’ was not noticed by the petitioner. Hence, order set aside and matter remanded back to Adjudicating Authority. Further, petitioner is granted time to file their reply.
Rajasthan High Court upholds trust registration under Section 12A, ruling initial approval hinges on genuine objects, not income application. Clarifies AO’s role in annual assessments.
Bombay High Court dismisses Revenue’s appeal against Agfa India, ruling reassessment invalid as Assessing Officer acted under dictation, lacking independent reason to believe income escaped assessment. Highlights judicial precedents on AO’s discretion.
Delhi High Court held that it is no longer open for the department to proceed with the adjudication of show cause notice which had not been adjudicated for almost fourteen years. Thus, letter recommencing adjudication proceedings are set aside.
Madras High Court held that in re-assessment proceedings the objections of assessee should be dealt in accordance with GKN Driveshafts principle. Here, all the proceedings are set aside since the GKN Driveshafts principle has not been strictly adhered to.
Karnataka High Court held that rectification of Form GSTR-1 for rectifying mismatch/ discrepancy for Assessment Year 2020-21 to be allowed in terms of Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST dated 27.12.2022. GST Department directed accordingly.
Gauhati High Court held that anticipatory bail application is not maintainable since ineligible ITC amount involved is less 5 crores and hence the case falls under bailable offence. Accordingly, the application is rejected.
