The Bombay High Court has quashed and remanded Local Body Tax (LBT) assessment orders, citing a lack of proper reasoning by the Thane Municipal Corporation.
The Rajasthan High Court issues an interim stay on tax recovery against CG Tollway Ltd., halting coercive action until the next hearing. This article provides a summary of the case.
Madras High Court held that verbatim reproduction of contents of show cause notice without independent reasoning for arriving at conclusion results into violation of principles of natural justice. Hence, matter remanded back to file of first respondent for fresh consideration.
Gujarat High Court permitted the petitioner to rectify Form GSTR-1 due to inadvertently showing the turnover of sister concern in Form GSTR-1 resulting into difference in outward supplies declared in Form GSTR-1 and Form GSTR-3B.
Assessee contended that he had closed operations on 28.07.2017 and sought new registration under M/s Samyak Fashion (India). His provisional GSTIN under M/s Samyak International was allegedly misused by unknown persons, leading to wrongful availment and passing on of ITC.
The interest was earned from fixed deposits maintained with banks for the purpose of the business and related to the business of assessee. Interest was also earned on refund of taxes due to wrongful deduction of TDS by the customers of assessee.
In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court ordered the disbursement of an accumulated Input Tax Credit refund to a petitioner, along with interest, within a strict three-week deadline.
Gauhati High Court has set aside a service tax demand, ruling that tax authority failed to prove it served show-cause notice to petitioner, and has remanded case back for a new hearing.
Kerala HC set aside an order against a rice and dairy products trader, directing tax authorities to re-evaluate disallowance of ITC in light of a recent judicial precedent that treats ITC as a fungible pool of funds.
The Orissa High Court has set aside a tax demand order against Sai Sitaram Construction, ruling that it illegally included a GST amount already levied for the same tax period.
