The court relied on a video recording, attesting witness testimony, and medical certification to confirm soundness of mind. Digital evidence was accepted as reliable corroboration of Will execution.
Orissa High Court held that post grant of refund by Assistant Commissioner, the recourse to adjudicate upon the same objection/content under Section 73 without giving due deference to the quasi judicial Appellate Order is unconscionable. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed.
Karnataka High Court held that in terms of auction memorandum, liquidator appointed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, was empowered to forfeit the Earnest Money Deposit [EMD] and Interest free Refundable Participation Deposit Money [PDM] deposited for participating in the auction.
The Court stayed tax action after noting an unusually long delay in issuing the assessment notice, holding that further proceedings should remain in abeyance pending clarification from the authorities.
Madras High Court held that in terms of provisions of section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 no action shall be taken against the property of the corporate debtor in relation to an offence committed prior to the commencement of the CIRP.
Kerala High Court held that levy of penalty on the basis of statement recorded under section 108 of the Customs Act is not sustainable since provisions of section 138B have not been complied with. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed.
Patna High Court allowed the writ and held that liquor manufacturer is permitted to payment for unsold stock which is destroyed on implementation of Bihar Government Prohibition policy effected in 2016. Accordingly, writ petition is allowed.
Madras High Court held that grant-in-aid/ subsidy received from the Government under a rehabilitation scheme is capital receipt and cannot be treated as revenue receipt. Accordingly, question of law is answered in favour of appellant.
Calcutta High Court held that present writ petition filed by personal guarantor is not maintainable since the proceeding u/s. 95 of the IBC is pending before Adjudicating Authority and petition is filed without taking appropriate steps before appropriate forum.
Gujarat High Court held that the services received in respect of setting up the captive wind mill plant are eligible for the Cenvat Credit under rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed.
