Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : The article explains visa requirements, documentation, and compliance obligations for foreign nationals seeking medical treatment ...
Corporate Law : The court ruled that using a registered trademark as a keyword to divert online traffic can amount to trademark infringement. The ...
Corporate Law : LMPC Registration is mandatory for manufacturers, packers, and importers of pre-packaged commodities. The key takeaway is that reg...
Corporate Law : The rise of GDPR, CCPA, and India’s DPDP Act is opening significant opportunities for Chartered Accountants. The key takeaway is...
Corporate Law : The document compiles 85 recent developments across financial regulation, anti-corruption enforcement, corporate investigations, a...
Corporate Law : The Competition Commission of India has proposed amendments to address administrative and procedural issues identified during impl...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : PFRDA has proposed major reductions in grievance resolution timelines under the NPS framework. The draft aims to improve accountab...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act covers attempts to obtain undue advantage through subor...
Corporate Law : The Tribunal held that for a guarantee payable on demand, limitation begins from the date the guarantee is invoked and not from th...
Corporate Law : The Authority found that a pre-selected donation mechanism added charges unless consumers actively opted out, impairing informed c...
Corporate Law : CCPA held that a subscription renewal interface using the phrase Accept Risk amounted to multiple prohibited dark patterns, includ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court quashed the removal of a Mathadhipati after finding that relied-upon documents were not properly supplied and th...
Corporate Law : The case involved a broker implementing substantial shareholding changes without obtaining IRDAI's prior approval as required by r...
Corporate Law : The regulator held that agreements lacking clear fee provisions undermined contractual clarity and regulatory compliance. A penalt...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority held that details of the official who uploaded CIRP documents were exempt from disclosure under Sect...
Corporate Law : The proposed 2026 amendments require successful completion of an accredited ISO 22000 Lead Auditor course for food safety auditors...
Corporate Law : IRDAI has directed insurers to disclose performance-linked remuneration details of Key Management Persons on their websites. The c...
Paragraph 27AA of the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) Scheme could not be automatically imposed on establishments exempted under Section 17 of the EPF Act unless the Appropriate Government issued a specific official notification modifying the conditions of such exemption.
The amendment introduces a new category of IFSC-based LLPs with specific regulatory provisions. It enables foreign currency operations and aligns LLPs with global financial practices.
The Court examined whether successive review petitions were maintainable. It held that without new evidence or error apparent, a second review is impermissible and restored the original judgment.
The Court examined whether review jurisdiction permits re-evaluation of evidence. It held that such reappreciation is impermissible and restored the original writ judgment.
The Court examined whether review powers were properly exercised. It held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by re-evaluating evidence, restoring the original findings.
The issue concerns whether startups can sell regulated products without BIS certification. It is established that certification is mandatory under QCOs, and non-compliance can lead to penalties, bans, or closure.
Supreme Court held that post repeal of SICA and non-invocation of IBC, Gannon Dunkerley & Co. Ltd. (GDCL) didn’t possess ownership rights to sell assets of Jaipur Udyog Ltd (JUL). Further, Court directed to verify and make payment of long-standing dues of workers of JUL.
Startups must obtain BIS certification for regulated products under mandatory Quality Control Orders. Compliance ensures legal operations and enhances customer confidence.
The Court ruled that making unverified allegations against judicial officers amounts to criminal contempt. It emphasized that criticism must be evidence-based and not undermine judicial authority.
The issue was whether an insolvency professional fulfilled due diligence obligations under Section 29A. The Committee held that failure to verify and disclose disqualification of a wilful defaulter invalidated the process. It emphasized that eligibility must be continuously assessed and cannot be ignored at later stages.
