Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : A detailed guide to LLP incorporation covering RUN-LLP, Form FILLIP, Form LLP-3, required documents, CRC approval and post-incorpo...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC quashed demolition proceedings, adopted Supreme Court directions, and issued further directions governing demolition ...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC examined criminal cases against advocates, Bar Council processes, verification issues, and issued compliance directio...
Corporate Law : Explains extra-judicial killings, constitutional and statutory provisions, Supreme Court guidelines and the legal framework govern...
Corporate Law : Explains the role, composition and functions of Safety Committees under Section 22 of the OSH Code, 2020 and the OSH Central Rules...
Corporate Law : CCPA begins action against 41 restaurants over default service charges, citing consumer complaints, 2022 Guidelines and the Consum...
Corporate Law : CBI filed its 16th chargesheet in a homebuyers fraud investigation alleging conspiracy, cheating and criminal breach of trust invo...
Corporate Law : DPIIT amends footwear QCOs by extending legacy stock clearance to 31 July 2027 and permitting annual import of 4,500 footwear samp...
Corporate Law : PIB issues a detailed FAQ on the Ethanol Blended Petrol Programme covering policy evolution, E20 rollout, vehicle compatibility, p...
Corporate Law : PIB outlines Indias E20 ethanol blending progress, programme milestones, industry views, and responses to frequently raised concer...
Corporate Law : DRAT declined to condone a 2417-day delay, holding the delay remained unexplained, and rejected the appeal against the DRT recover...
Corporate Law : CCPA held the 50,000-hour LED claim misleading for lacking product-level substantiation, ordered its discontinuation, and impose...
Corporate Law : CCPA imposed a ₹10 lakh penalty on TradeIndia for walkie-talkie listings lacking mandatory regulatory disclosures and directed f...
Corporate Law : CCPA imposed a ₹10 lakh penalty on Amazon over walkie-talkie listings lacking mandatory regulatory disclosures and directed comp...
Corporate Law : Kerala HC upheld rejection of education loans based on a parent's low credit score under the extant IBA Scheme but allowed fresh c...
Corporate Law : BCI directs State Bar Councils and law colleges to immediately implement its Circular on social media conduct, digital ethics and ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an Insolvency Professional's registration over CIRP compliance lapses, disclosure failures and Code violations in t...
Corporate Law : FSSAI amends the notified food laboratory list, updating accredited laboratories, registrations and scopes across multiple States ...
Corporate Law : PFRDA notifies Regulatory Sandbox Regulations, 2026 enabling controlled testing with limited relaxations while protecting subscrib...
Corporate Law : PFRDAs 2026 amendment allows Pension Funds to engage entities for specific purpose schemes under NPS, subject to Authority guideli...
The Madras High Court held that courts are empowered under Section 73 of the Evidence Act to compare disputed and admitted signatures without necessarily requiring expert evidence. It restored the Trial Courts decree after finding the comparison legally valid.
The Madras High Court held that although execution of the promissory note was admitted, the plaintiff failed to prove that consideration had actually passed. It confirmed dismissal of the money recovery suit.
The Allahabad High Court held that a bona fide typographical error in the date of birth could be corrected since it did not confer any eligibility advantage. It quashed the rejection order and directed the authorities to conduct the petitioner’s detailed medical examination.
The Supreme Court held that disputed monetary claims arising from a construction contract could not be decided in writ proceedings. It ruled that such disputes must be resolved through the agreed arbitration mechanism.
The Supreme Court held that cancellation of a public tender was arbitrary because it was driven by ministerial directions without proper application of mind. It restored the successful bidder’s contractual rights and set aside the High Court’s decision.
The Supreme Court held that High Courts should ordinarily refrain from entertaining writ petitions in SARFAESI matters where an effective statutory remedy before the DRT exists. The ruling reiterates the limited scope of Article 226 in commercial recovery disputes.
The Jharkhand High Court held that a marriage marked by 36 years of separation had become a “dead wood marriage,” justifying dissolution. It also enhanced the wife’s permanent alimony from ₹10 lakh to ₹40 lakh.
The Supreme Court held that a mortgage redemption suit filed before expiry of the agreed mortgage term must fail. It set aside the remand order and restored the dismissal of the suit as premature.
The article explains that a partnership comprising only two partners stands dissolved on the death of one partner under the Partnership Act. It also outlines the tax and compliance implications of carrying on the business until a new firm is constituted.
The NCLT held that an investment made under a film production and revenue-sharing agreement did not constitute an Operational Debt. As no goods or services were provided, the Section 9 IBC petition was dismissed as not maintainable.
